Re: Some proxy needs
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 09 April 2012 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D1321F8738 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59-MHM7Z+dtS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678C421F8733 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SHGwQ-00057v-HA for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:55:42 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1SHGwH-00056c-7n for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:55:33 +0000
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1SHGwE-00069K-5H for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:55:31 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; l=3338; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333986930; x=1335196530; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=8e05E/WFKLrduy+PWuMMZJK5Zf+ORACTwUusr0sGfZE=; b=V1JCwd4DqYwotfgK4jG+8SiwXUacjhny4YU5KMSTcF8WFfCDLCF26ZTJ EGMqAEjW9hoGuziiTzf9f1j4ITcji85feG/D82mXk3m/tgcBPH5The9QN 9bVBonjvBUd0nVXN6/sOkSM4Mcb5/IL7VuRVVQY2pP2nKX4fVxPs7U++S g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAEQFg0+Q/khL/2dsb2JhbABEhWazOoEHggkBAQEEEgEQVQEQCwQUCRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBHodsmhqNC5Jrj0KBGASVbI5NgWmCaQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.75,393,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="134622089"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2012 15:55:04 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-55-82-137.cisco.com (dhcp-10-55-82-137.cisco.com [10.55.82.137]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q39Ft3oB028318; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:55:03 GMT
Message-ID: <4F830657.4010900@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:55:03 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
CC: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <em6115c368-93f5-4d63-90c9-eec1bd99bcf5@BOMBED>
In-Reply-To: <em6115c368-93f5-4d63-90c9-eec1bd99bcf5@BOMBED>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020408020402010205000709"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=144.254.224.140; envelope-from=lear@cisco.com; helo=ams-iport-1.cisco.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1SHGwE-00069K-5H c91a6eb62fef9262e5828d21338e0074
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Some proxy needs
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/4F830657.4010900@cisco.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13411
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SHGwQ-00057v-HA@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:55:42 +0000
On 4/8/12 2:50 PM, Adrien W. de Croy wrote: > [discoverability] >> >> I would have thought this was a job for DHCP ? >> > > DHCP has some issues with this, it's not standardised, and option 252 > vs DNS lookups for WPAD... it's a bit of a mess. > > and has no capability for communicating policy, or requirements for > enforcement. > DHCP's problems aren't really that. It's easy to write a new option. DHCP's problems are the following: 1. Will O/S vendors adopt a new option? 2. Will browsers tie to the O/S for the information (it's inherently an O/S function and you wouldn't want http clients making DHCP calls on their own)? Let's assume for a moment that a PAC file or something similar is pointed to. That's probably rich enough for most. Assuming the file is shared over SSL, then there's the matter of whether the source is trusted. That's ALSO not a DHCP problem, but a problem with ANY discovery mechanism. I'll argue that if you can get O/S vendors into the game, then [2] should follow because it probably doesn't make sense to have more than one of these things on a host, and could lead to unintended inconsistent behavior. Eliot
- Re[2]: Some proxy needs Adrien W. de Croy
- Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Some proxy needs Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Some proxy needs Mark Nottingham
- Re: Some proxy needs Eliot Lear
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Per Buer
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Per Buer
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Per Buer
- Re: Some proxy needs Adrien W. de Croy
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Roberto Peon
- Re: Some proxy needs Anthony Bryan