IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HTTP/2.0 SETTINGS frame values

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Tue, 28 May 2013 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B58D21F9540 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 02:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29MJ94w0teWd for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 02:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A9721F9500 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 02:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UhGGB-0005ea-9c for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 09:32:03 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 09:32:03 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UhGGB-0005ea-9c@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1UhGFz-0005dA-56 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 09:31:51 +0000
Received: from mail-out1.uio.no ([129.240.10.57]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1UhGFw-0007mY-GE for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 09:31:51 +0000
Received: from mail-mx6.uio.no ([129.240.10.40]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1UhGFa-0006PN-OA; Tue, 28 May 2013 11:31:26 +0200
Received: from boomerang.ifi.uio.no ([129.240.68.135]) by mail-mx6.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1UhGFa-00025P-6P; Tue, 28 May 2013 11:31:26 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E740D1DA-5B91-444A-B9D3-266C9E53B439"
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <A372C012-0840-4B0F-8F49-D735F6B1D342@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:31:25 +0200
Cc: iccrg@irtf.org
Message-Id: <B910C3C4-3566-430C-A82D-756E2DE7A855@ifi.uio.no>
References: <A372C012-0840-4B0F-8F49-D735F6B1D342@ifi.uio.no>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 6 msgs/h 4 sum rcpts/h 7 sum msgs/h 5 total rcpts 4481 max rcpts/h 40 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.5, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.551, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 19D1C75F1654A2E5C96682420F9B9D8F95C0F865
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.68.135 spam_score: -54 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 4 total 2000 max/h 12 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Received-SPF: none client-ip=129.240.10.57; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=mail-out1.uio.no
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.07
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UhGFw-0007mY-GE 6caededee0f9c41d1acbe555935cfb88
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2.0 SETTINGS frame values
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/B910C3C4-3566-430C-A82D-756E2DE7A855@ifi.uio.no>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18110
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I can't believe that this keeps happening to me (being one of the chairs of ICCRG) - very sorry, everyone! Here's a fix, using the correct address for ICCRG!

Cheers,
Michael


On 28. mai 2013, at 11:25, Michael Welzl wrote:

> (including ICCRG because folks there might be interested)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just joined the list. While I did look at some old presentations from minutes and the list archive, I might have missed an answer to the question I'm asking - my apologies in this case!
> 
> Here it goes: here, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-02#section-3.7.4
> various values are defined, like an estimate of the upload bandwidth, download bandwidth, the RTT, the initial window and so forth.
> 
> I wonder, has it been discussed whether these things are useful and/or appropriate?
> I have only seen a thread related to SETTINGS_CURRENT_CWND, but what about all the other stuff (values 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7)? This smells like a feedback channel for app-layer congestion control, is this the plan  (of, ahem, the whole HTTPBIS group) ?    :-)
> 
> Thanks, cheers,
> Michael
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email