Content-Range on responses other than 206
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 15 July 2011 13:20 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D46321F856D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id anyiAN5s0rR1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D43821F8563 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1QhiJF-0003Cf-Lh for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:20:01 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1QhiJ6-0003Bj-4b for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:19:52 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1QhiIz-0003Kt-Ml for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:19:51 +0000
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.98.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3841C50A65; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:19:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:19:21 +1000
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FE504DA6-4D3A-4EAC-9416-4C28B832312A@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1QhiIz-0003Kt-Ml 75c3a1d6039d82563a56a7eb99ff4cb4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Content-Range on responses other than 206
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/FE504DA6-4D3A-4EAC-9416-4C28B832312A@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/10946
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1QhiJF-0003Cf-Lh@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:20:01 +0000
Anyone object to stating that Content-Range has no meaning on responses that aren't 206's? Right now we don't say that, and it causes problems; see http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=45116 Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Content-Range on responses other than 206 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Willy Tarreau
- #301: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Yves Lafon
- Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Julian Reschke
- Content-Range on responses other than 206 Yves Lafon