Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 26 January 2020 07:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D35312008D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:35:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=yb7L7Js3; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=lBnid1Ne
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cyikrI3kHAnZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A82412001B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:35:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ivcPL-0005s9-4d for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:32:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:32:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ivcPL-0005s9-4d@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <do_not_reply@mnot.net>) id 1ivcPJ-0005rN-9V for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:32:33 +0000
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <do_not_reply@mnot.net>) id 1ivcPG-0007bN-GZ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:32:33 +0000
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA314D4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 02:32:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Jan 2020 02:32:26 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=vr0Cz8DFCxl6KE1Ejq+fxts4Ui/IPc3jcwHoypGLhNk=; b=yb7L7Js3 e2gwiVXQofIFAjAk9J3W47v2uHlBlCHCF4mMWem6/yhnJad/pfJIvVaN7YVOsnED jCakEKMg14u++Ucqgh1S723eMye9cqbTmRTenZb5tV2MNwK1OCKI1szDuysPNcei DugzAEJ+via7zrjnhrICQsOE5TlYBFP9GUpLBHwurFGGJROk2mgn+o9MCwVyRzXy 4ds0Ar2ru/AUvyZ5KkS7L8wsF97enYcYv6eA6ks8BJTUdcLdFCLOmt70MTSEcgRO 4gBeJKV+LcojSB9gmCtdnOIIbcd6Eg2/5DijkMNRUI46t8eCWdqemZqgnMZCK7j2 Z7y9DsZT+HFkxg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=vr0Cz8DFCxl6KE1Ejq+fxts4Ui/IP c3jcwHoypGLhNk=; b=lBnid1Neb36rb4PQr/Q6TcQG9d7Hg3wgDyYhzhuzHCuNK d1QRCwX7E8ity6OH/CcjZDahzfvWTVZUXPdQq7XxF10Yz1f7XNBEwG4PJeVIN+jy BR73NB7MIBck9RTncqldUzwzOSd/+Zwls95P+D89RIQ98R64fx9WvVATRgbzUuzA 6TggjPaPQhWPa7aKdK+c7Y9sBZi6fPEWjN7/8/8GqPf+fVPL5TSgK2rFAL8z/Zo/ ruXr330Zsn/Ax3iVmESzMYBmHb7kEMok/Cl5ghyH/xT1l+3T+w8TZhRI0BXnfx7/ JYVtxDnfSawzWdgJlA6Bu+7DSbKdtD9dcehXsiYJw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:iUAtXgQ3ToI7lWAetC_Oa8kXFHVPoEch7JCIeWZHC6leKgZ1XQtbBA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrvdelgddugecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenuc fhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuueho thcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepgh hithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeehvddrudekgedrudeljedrgeenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:iUAtXjsmW204hMVLf9oUDnPQ6Yaj24wPPrRWsiExLIbHH8FqK_VUKw> <xmx:iUAtXq_o-UGlsROjGtzNVZTelMQIS8HYmvKdZYANLTBw52XFtN3o_g> <xmx:iUAtXkxXs3q2QvHvSzl_oUUZZGnG11mvtA1lAPk_Ps1bkZSU7xJWgg> <xmx:ikAtXhqXudJm8-bV2mck8ewvYhboQcKk53BYW8r7O-kG3X5jvYVhuw>
Received: from [10.1.0.4] (unknown [52.184.197.4]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8C7843067490 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 02:32:25 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============5516793906062663581=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20200126073225.8C7843067490@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 02:32:25 -0500
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.25; envelope-from=do_not_reply@mnot.net; helo=wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1ivcPG-0007bN-GZ 2d5323e8bf28e307d35a42e1fef913e6
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20200126073225.8C7843067490@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37283
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Events without label "editorial" Issues ------ * httpwg/http-core (+4/-0/💬3) 4 issues created: - Prefer SRV records over just A/AAAA (by vanrein) https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/280 - Deprecation of too much userinfo (was: RFC7230 Errata 5964) (by vanrein) https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/278 - Clarification of GET versus POST for information retrieval (by bazzadp) https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/277 - Content-Length is weird (by mnot) https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/276 [h1-messaging] [semantics] 2 issues received 3 new comments: - #277 Clarification of GET versus POST for information retrieval (2 by asbjornu, bazzadp) https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/277 - #276 Content-Length is weird (1 by mnot) https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/276 [h1-messaging] [semantics] * httpwg/http-extensions (+4/-8/💬48) 4 issues created: - [SH] algorithm to serialise a key is lax (by phluid61) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1037 - 6265bis: "site.example" is not under "com" PSL! (by bagder) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1034 - Remove "MUST store last-access-time" for each cookie? (by bagder) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1032 - Uploading a new version of RFC6265bis. (by mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1031 10 issues received 48 new comments: - #1034 6265bis: "site.example" is not under "com" PSL! (1 by mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1034 [6265bis] - #1032 Remove "MUST store last-access-time" for each cookie? (3 by bagder, johnwilander, mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1032 [6265bis] - #1031 Uploading a new version of RFC6265bis. (4 by martinthomson, mikewest, reschke) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1031 - #1027 Key syntax (6 by mnot, phluid61) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1027 [header-structure] - #1026 Merging priorities (9 by LPardue, kazuho, martinthomson, tombergan) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1026 [priorities] - #1023 Semantics for priorities (1 by tombergan) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1023 [priorities] - #1020 Deprecate sha-1 (1 by ioggstream) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1020 [digest-headers] - #1015 Structured Headers and GREASE (20 by kazuho, martinthomson, mnot, phluid61, yoavweiss) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1015 [header-structure] - #933 SameSite attribute is not easily extensible (2 by davidben, mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/933 [6265bis] [samesite] - #716 Consider a `Sec-CH-` prefix for client hint headers (1 by yoavweiss) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/716 [client-hints] 8 issues closed: - [SH] algorithm to serialise a key is lax https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1037 [header-structure] - Key syntax https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1027 [header-structure] - 6265bis: "site.example" is not under "com" PSL! https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1034 [6265bis] - Uploading a new version of RFC6265bis. https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1031 - Multiple SameSite attributes in cookie-attribute-list https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/901 [6265bis] [samesite] - Consider a `Sec-CH-` prefix for client hint headers https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/716 [client-hints] - RFC6265bis: "The SameSite Attribute" summary makes no mention to setting limitations. https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1014 [6265bis] [samesite] - Add example of unpatched response with its digest. https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/973 [digest-headers] Pull requests ------------- * httpwg/http-core (+1/-0/💬0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Issue #278, Deprecation of too much userinfo (by vanrein) https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/279 * httpwg/http-extensions (+5/-5/💬7) 5 pull requests submitted: - [RFC6265bis, Editorial] Consistently use 'last-access-time'. (by mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1040 - Encourage end-to-end grease by applications (by mnot) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1039 - [RFC6265bis, Editorial]: Define "public suffix" in the terminology section. (by mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1038 - allow "." in key (by phluid61) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1036 - [RFC6265bis, Editorial]: Actually use `example` TLD. (by mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1035 3 pull requests received 7 new comments: - #1038 [RFC6265bis, Editorial]: Define "public suffix" in the terminology section. (5 by mikewest, reschke) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1038 - #1035 [RFC6265bis, Editorial]: Actually use `example` TLD. (1 by mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1035 - #1030 Add Wilander as editor and move Barth from Authors to Acknowledgements. (1 by mikewest) https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1030 [6265bis] 5 pull requests merged: - [SH] allow "." in key https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1036 [header-structure] - [RFC6265bis, Editorial]: Actually use `example` TLD. https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1035 - Add Wilander as editor and move Barth from Authors to Acknowledgements. https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1030 [6265bis] - Add Sec- prefix to security considerations https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/776 [client-hints] - Fix: #973. Error response is unrelated to the effective request URI https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1004 [digest-headers] Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/httpwg/http-core * https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot