Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging)
"Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 17:12 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D00E21F8779 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.405
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.194, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ceR2Nd68kLiR for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04CA21F874E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Qu68b-0002Jv-Cx for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:12:13 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <fielding@gbiv.com>) id 1Qu68P-0002IY-Tn for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:12:01 +0000
Received: from caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.177] helo=homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <fielding@gbiv.com>) id 1Qu68O-0004xW-9T for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:12:01 +0000
Received: from homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E5F584059; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=gbiv.com; b=lzcsMnhzQPdkWrDB 5NvxD1akuMsuAE6Mtd5hVdZzwQPFwyyibgpIJIdkrrC5DYS9+Z9X2jHk6cG4PYd8 LuG7mbDoTlVAEOvEZZYOaXwkRTGkVj9lJCznI+qd6GLvm5Ns9feCcI0jiHQNH7wU 9jKxsWbt+AB/ObrXQ1nY+8PnqxQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=Wb2JzTLdmgvTdZceJNp5WXi41fw=; b=or/TzG+JfAf20t0lOdRh1uiHEvFk Nqz6Q0AvyKflXz6O3py6YFcR1TpeecRuPO/jK77oxwtulwTSM6DRoJwFJdJIEhPG 0wsaZ/GtDKVyfK8CsJmgrQiIcjq/Yoq3frCIoZAyKipgGOvCMSC+thrkh7sGJx0I LQVBnR/RkYRnvxA=
Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 023DE584064; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E4D0F29.2000203@cyblogic.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:11:44 -0700
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A580036D-D382-479F-A07A-0994A69D5DAB@gbiv.com>
References: <4E4C013D.2090407@cyblogic.de> <88b489507e504d9eef318438194f929e@treenet.co.nz> <4E4CC609.7070500@cyblogic.de> <4E4CCEE4.7000804@treenet.co.nz> <4E4D0F29.2000203@cyblogic.de>
To: Frank Mertens <frank@cyblogic.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=208.97.132.177; envelope-from=fielding@gbiv.com; helo=homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Qu68O-0004xW-9T d91de44292b0bc189ed3def7bee50eb3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/A580036D-D382-479F-A07A-0994A69D5DAB@gbiv.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/11217
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Qu68b-0002Jv-Cx@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:12:13 +0000
On Aug 18, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Frank Mertens wrote: > YES, you are right and I fully agree with your ABNF rules. > I was misreading BWS as WS yesterday. Anyone around here, that can make the > changes? p1 is currently being rewritten, so all of those rules will be changing soon. ....Roy
- Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) Frank Mertens
- Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messagi… Amos Jeffries
- Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messagi… Frank Mertens
- Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messagi… Frank Mertens
- Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messagi… Amos Jeffries
- Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messagi… Frank Mertens
- Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messagi… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messagi… Julian Reschke