Re: Alt-Svc WGLC
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 10 January 2016 16:26 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EEA1ACE22 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:26:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKx_JUqA7NhD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D88E1ACE20 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aIIla-0005Mn-Vt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:22:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:22:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aIIla-0005Mn-Vt@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1aIIlY-0005M6-Je for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:22:52 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1aIIlX-0003ja-Ap for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:22:52 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.79.150]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ls7MZ-1aCUyG3Phv-013zHf; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:22:23 +0100
To: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <566EA6AF.60100@gmx.de> <56703332.1000006@crf.canon.fr>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <56928545.7010804@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:22:29 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56703332.1000006@crf.canon.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:k+66yzRs/plM+FgC7CnFjTjw7vBJZUJOMiwQOsUH1Qwj9jUhJXv rCcYGFdLEXpdgxSGkCbVbYXcXIGcFrw97sNiNQINUDWCNXI9pjTlrOT5iWV6U5iXBf4/11W 0ZbOLDgu6hLEgNt0zPbl7m4wlH2lOlDXeOO8jztertO85SbQuGSXdlhnGEv/x8ZxrQqqFLQ JQ3wtycc34DItj8yyLAuQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:QVa8ikaW7LY=:lTjJVOQBiDyMvD81zlNa0s FAfU5Z96kZLDs7vIk1LKyf2XVjQFP4NZMtzwgyVU8rvp4kUihc8q3sWWDEk0fem613tuFEy9E 8OFfbHAuUiZOJ8z3g7Hv8I8o2WNA6U/8ntxKhHvZQJ9gq1HSnn6LwND8E1usjMwvhrG5YFkRe tvSKSvg430xE5wS3yZm2NWZ/uII2NqAI3sgzBQRNGqERshgPdO8rd2cyBaAHZkZKAniqloQRo 1/D4BnqBpC++7tjkoqLiAsg3ALnNVhvwWmCfkay9qlQpHLA4yDH1KyNCYqXb2zCb3Da/AQarc Moj4ytPVS5Cyp2chORdgPsQiotk90lcZpjfDacz8aQ/699Q5IgRM7lXGnqhVhH/gyXY+1SkUj 7/PX94CM4JpIEX27z9U6HL1sPgoy5WGmSCfRqZVdPoOcdt6snYKeuaZqD0n3g5iCkQhMZwS2f 9wlQd+ykr1z0no85u6z2RrkLRt4d2NoyDoIjiQUSRfO5eGAeX337gOYKIDXJ8wMT4MhaSWD/w bLRQJS51bfPF5Mopd76OlzA5JJ0fG5XYwmgE/dXRNmkkWmp4Am6GSCf1tPv1x7WUYCU+g6D6s FRKG+P2EimVJvp4bpMiGVRbKATBGtnTvTOP8TRT/VXqVxQic09+dSGyvV/4lu8qQB/g8pjCtQ ieyL1GD44NK4fdEwwo/6f92HtQQ6V7yhtlTiKScyMgxi/MRqdfdTU/fhuHJeZWKi+sfC2gY1x P9wner2u0fosYOqwacFL+2KJS7k6PdFcOW9kQRInEL0vm3X0bkgP/Ib0Tlqw7xwlPRcOqO+c8 7MESMpS
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.422, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aIIlX-0003ja-Ap 72dc34647f4e3fd8ee079a768d165a52
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Alt-Svc WGLC
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/56928545.7010804@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30875
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 2015-12-15 16:35, Hervé Ruellan wrote: > ... >> 2) In >> <https://github.com/hruellan/http-extensions/commit/fabd0943cde7e8af07f20b74acc2e48ac16e5f3e>, >> >> Hervé proposes a change that IMHO is not editorial as it affects a >> normative requirement. Feedback appreciated. > > Yes, this affects a normative requirement. However my proposed addition > is already in the spec, in the third paragraph of "9.2 Changing Hosts", > which is referring to 2.1. I find it better to have the whole > description in 2.1. > ... I just noticed that I failed to reply to this. The proposed change is to replace "Clients MUST NOT use alternative services with a host that is different from the origin's without strong server authentication; ...." by "Clients MUST NOT use an alternative service with a host that is different than the origin's without strong server authentication linking the alternative service with the origin's identity. ..." My remaining concern is that "...linking the alternative service with the origin's identity..." might not sufficiently precise for a normative requirement. More feedback appreciated. Best regards, Julian
- Alt-Svc WGLC Julian Reschke
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Mark Nottingham
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Julian Reschke
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Hervé Ruellan
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Julian Reschke
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Julian Reschke
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Julian Reschke
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Erik Nygren
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Erik Nygren
- Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose