IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 01 April 2015 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BA81A8A59 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C17k5i9vtOKI for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66F2E1A8A62 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YdDj3-0007jN-HK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:10:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:10:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YdDj3-0007jN-HK@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YdDj1-0007iS-IP for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:10:11 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YdDix-0004W6-F0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:10:11 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([95.93.109.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MdrK9-1Yp8ML0vxl-00PfrS; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:09:16 +0200
Message-ID: <551BA7AC.4080001@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:09:16 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <1C7436D4-D1EF-454C-BC14-E8C00165AA2E@mnot.net> <39087.1427812836@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150331182521.GF7183@1wt.eu> <40146.1427835401@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <40146.1427835401@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:1nN3EoemIhH85pESKZ8xqqeiv4EqlPjQJAEaAjWDuyP4fyxNC4h okkyxuKYeXtVp/r3o3+0+OK5WTWvyESZPK8jGCTWIkCSk5Zpe0EFsP1IG0DNRLZNQANICko xcL0+NZIpurtDXGKZ4Fn5Q8u5nnlqU53LE++EKFJDmO/IWvbR0Re+nSkgTS3eORz3jSdsJz AIkGbZTE/tXemfG8nQHjg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YdDix-0004W6-F0 ff3fc9caaeba789063740431e7461aae
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/551BA7AC.4080001@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29169
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2015-03-31 22:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <20150331182521.GF7183@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
>
>>> Third, are there *any* valid reasons to even allow other charsets
>>> than ISO-8859-1 or UTF-8 from 2015 forward ?
>>
>> Idem. And if we don't need to do more than that, then probably we
>> just need a boolean to say "this is not ISO-8859-1, hence this is
>> UTF-8" and make the encoding implicit by the sole presence of the
>> encoding tag (eg: the "*" or "=", I don't remember right now).
>
> In that case I could live with it being per field, because the
> signal could be a single character and we could probably
> dispense with the % encoding too.

Friends, this is not a new format. It is implemented in all major user 
agents, so it really doesn't make sense to invent a new shorter syntax 
approximately 15 years after this has been defined first.

Best regards, Julian

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status