Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Mon, 01 April 2013 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA8D21E809D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHsOH7aU-ldE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E18921E8063 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UMkFV-0000Hw-Q3 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:18:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:18:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UMkFV-0000Hw-Q3@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1UMkFT-0000HG-PE for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:18:31 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1UMkFP-000722-A5 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:18:31 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id oi10so2183407obb.14 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Zy+gJEwsJY7vFo60I3tsdRMyPWwpZXSod5AjY3lbdSA=; b=SUds1YsGvW9fyZHuEe6Cj3+cSUMc1+J0jQ/hNgj+xYNALfOwh7LGfioVLJFnrK91hP /PycrNUnTyh8jIwlj6jOfB/BmZ/YM9KBEXBbNxCyd44zqKPBsgAlhN5NclGHGcJZd6Sc WTaOo//H0WoIN/VP2RW2iCt2+d5ePXwM5IaObZ5L33IhRe5Ik8VxJomdjcGd3+CCPJqM enZm7qKAZX0YRDTN28U9uqAJ0RNc6Yx2wdwfjqNWpYoDTuEEJOakRg0EApCzsxCKYNDZ 4VL8CgNQ0VUHwfCwVAMvZwv6538SCU2dgFJCnhF+cRlzfR2Qoz6QBzzbK03kf/nKRdIL iSAA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.23.101 with SMTP id l5mr4433304obf.16.1364843880433; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.109.72 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3HoZ2zHBNpRw7NrVZO5UsdnPuW3ZiSu56ppM5fqhaP+5=uFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8e7e9a7db6204492afde5d8883570579@BN1PR03MB006.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAP+FsNeG4ew88sWs6OL+PQXbqSANE6smRTJuVBzo8ppkLVPYtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3HoZ2zHBNpRw7NrVZO5UsdnPuW3ZiSu56ppM5fqhaP+5=uFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:18:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNf2NE+mH2a6KxdNan6oh1Uvb3LoVojCuU9kOV1aQs3WkQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>
Cc: Jitu Padhye <padhye@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@skype.net>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043749e1ab1d3904d9517a39
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.169; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f169.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.681, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UMkFP-000722-A5 ba8f662582a957e868bdd52dd39af15a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNf2NE+mH2a6KxdNan6oh1Uvb3LoVojCuU9kOV1aQs3WkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17193
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Unless we limit ourselves to a single HTTP/1 connection for HTTP/1.x , yes
(which we don't...) :)


-=R


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>wrote;wrote:

> On 2 April 2013 07:31, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Which is worse, starting with 1 connection with a cwnd of 32, or
> starting 6
> > connections each with a cwnd of 6?
>
> Is this an Either-Or situation?
>
> -Rob
>