Re: HTTP/2 Push deployed on webtide.com

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 19 August 2014 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F7A1A873B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aahyxmp-6JId for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B021A8733 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XJXYh-0006Sn-Rh for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:45:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:45:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XJXYh-0006Sn-Rh@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1XJXYQ-0006Ki-GY for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:45:38 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1XJXYP-0002ar-EK for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:45:38 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.55] (unknown [118.209.123.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 780DC22E253; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:45:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NHwVay7ZLSh16V8eB0tmyLQS_fyvdRbUhifHv7XCWdB0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:45:11 +1000
Cc: Simone Bordet <sbordet@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FE5429E2-0133-4BC2-8740-7EAB3B4B451C@mnot.net>
References: <CAFWmRJ0gbdoTL7AWxqMa-qJhWB2u_FshxG=qZ2pYEGML2wWWmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NHwVay7ZLSh16V8eB0tmyLQS_fyvdRbUhifHv7XCWdB0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.074, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XJXYP-0002ar-EK 293b40865ac82e158c92ef17b5d6fdb3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 Push deployed on webtide.com
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/FE5429E2-0133-4BC2-8740-7EAB3B4B451C@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26645
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

My .02 - that seems to sum it up pretty well.

Cheers,


On 19 Aug 2014, at 9:55 am, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

> 
> Note that there is a thread on the Servlet EG list regarding an API for push:
> 
> https://java.net/projects/servlet-spec/lists/jsr340-experts/archive/2014-08/message/1
> 
> where I've been asked some questions to describe "the rationalization used by the httpbis wg"
> 
> Since I can't speak for the WG, I thought I'd echo my thoughts here regarding the push mechanism to check that I'm not misrepresenting anything:
> 	• Push is a server-side coordinated mechanism in as much as the server must decide to push a resourced based only on information that it already has.   Specifically h2 provides no information on the contents or status of downstream caches.   
> 	• Servers are free to innovate push strategies, with some of the following having been suggested:
> 		• Use knowledge from the web application/framework to determine what are associated resources.
> 		• Use heuristics derived from referrer headers and timing to infer what are associated resources
> 		• Use sessions to track what resources a client has requested/received to avoid unnecessary pushes 
> 		• Use the presence of if-modified headers to infer the status of a client cache to avoid unnecessary pushes.
> 	• There are no functional problems other than increased latency of not pushing an associated resource
> 	• There are no functional problems other than wasted bandwidth of pushing an unnecessary resource:
> 		• Clients can reset a pushed stream if they determine it is unnecessary.   Thus is a server attempts to push a resource that is already cached by the client, a RST will prevent wasting too much bandwidth.
> 
> Hopefully nothing controversial or misrepresented there?
> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> 
> On 18 August 2014 18:57, Simone Bordet <sbordet@intalio.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the Jetty team has deployed h2-14 with HTTP/2 Push functionality on
> https://webtide.com, see
> https://webtide.com/http2-push-with-experimental-servlet-api/.
> 
> We are very interested in comments about how to make HTTP/2 Push
> better, so please try it out and tell us (also see discussion bullets
> towards the end of blog post).
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> --
> Simone Bordet
> ----
> http://cometd.org
> http://webtide.com
> http://intalio.com
> Developer advice, training, services and support
> from the Jetty & CometD experts.
> Intalio, the modern way to build business applications.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> 
> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
> http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/