Re: Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings IDs
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 26 April 2013 20:53 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8563E21F95EA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.860, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DTZImDh+lSA1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD9621F991A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UVpdd-000386-0j for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:53:01 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:53:01 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UVpdd-000386-0j@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UVpdY-00037H-MK for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:52:56 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UVpdY-0000kG-3O for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:52:56 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id t9so3490922wey.19 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=E8mUtn+NzBd7XTbkcWaaWCuVe2I2s6KY7xmKtcOcbKY=; b=Ji7DxGGRUftK/BPdpo9Hwyhxl0/iLNYvp/E74nInoCd5Com692oormb9Cf/+FC5YBC Tt/zTMk/s036/ar0d2YHDn1xf1eoBKFMR/TTvz1NQSv+Y0lYDpXJMYQXAhibO+E1uxnl y5CAxWqVx2/XOJ+1p8TYjXGpo3Sy+OTh9JO1afIbC5kONEwBg/IbVWQrCxy9mx04pBl+ 4gHoZoPVgjMV1AxxeMgya9I8olwkq6ttVhkIwYPIE7KYPOF8ad0aVWuyo4AVnwJMLKWK 7c7kA6NXAEkVWts2ALUc+I6P+KOOIF2RGLHoHVRM15NnQOrpOr5WukAWDRS5NRvo+OF7 17AQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.236.169 with SMTP id uv9mr3612691wjc.42.1367009549980; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.102 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbfeRy=VtKPZwQ2rVOOcB=_ARwGw_NCvQPZUAKMqWUiGKA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbfeRy=VtKPZwQ2rVOOcB=_ARwGw_NCvQPZUAKMqWUiGKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:52:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXRh51N_BfvMMDHVHaOMO+3dETys6cx8zY1Mr6m-Jz2DQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.174; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f174.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.657, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UVpdY-0000kG-3O dfb20aca23f75f60d4f81b33e364d16b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings IDs
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXRh51N_BfvMMDHVHaOMO+3dETys6cx8zY1Mr6m-Jz2DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17624
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
See earlier response. If you want something other than "MUST ignore" it's possible to negotiate a different protocol. An alternative is to add a flag to settings that mark them as "MUST understand". On 26 April 2013 13:47, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > We currently define Settings as being extensible but we do not define, > as far as I can tell, what should happen if a Settings ID is not known > or recognized by an endpoint. > > We could define it as MUST IGNORE but that could be dangerous > depending on what the new setting is being used for. >
- Re: Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings I… Martin Thomson
- Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings IDs James M Snell
- Re: Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings I… James M Snell