Re: Confusion in preconditions

Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> Wed, 01 February 2012 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3089811E80B2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:49:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FtsbfCAJvoK7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C8811E8071 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1RscQS-0004JM-31 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:48:48 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>) id 1RscQH-0004II-6L for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:48:37 +0000
Received: from mail-vx0-f171.google.com ([209.85.220.171]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>) id 1RscQB-0002rq-83 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:48:36 +0000
Received: by vcbfo11 with SMTP id fo11so1293968vcb.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:48:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jgMByvwPU/dUFgEUYJUMkrBi/abphLS+2nhVjHGgySY=; b=SseKSTA4ZKaNv4glGnWwSGBz9n9oAccIbPXg6D5YDAGguNeV6eS5XIPpCsvbh9mO9p Q62wK128ggjq/e0fNgJn9C9BLeJ42uT4ZmS1+mbXTif0+zjfa4QMP+NdBG9xyIp7ZEtx yXAzJ/4HqGQY30ImENqqeCkOX5gKXt2oNLM1I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.17.174 with SMTP id p14mr13033995vdd.20.1328111286140; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.192.137 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:48:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120201005931.0902f663.eric@bisonsystems.net>
References: <3DDD0BE655869D4EA506652B3803AEF6C3519BA5@PRISM.caffeine-it.net> <CACuKZqE+Vw80aZNzFSOp9bSFoAQa+OYa4Bg91uNrsyBu0CjwDA@mail.gmail.com> <20120201005931.0902f663.eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:48:06 -0600
Message-ID: <CACuKZqGzAJQAaQv9wh_g3L4pKaLg5cUgAQ78qCy3TPqwmzO18g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Cc: Sebastien Lambla <seb@serialseb.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.171; envelope-from=zhong.j.yu@gmail.com; helo=mail-vx0-f171.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1RscQB-0002rq-83 4baeb7bddd3a35815d214918ec8df06e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Confusion in preconditions
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACuKZqGzAJQAaQv9wh_g3L4pKaLg5cUgAQ78qCy3TPqwmzO18g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/12300
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1RscQS-0004JM-31@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:48:48 +0000

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net> wrote:
>> Why does the spec instead "beat around the bush", going very
>> roundabout ways, only setting some constraints on some scenarios? Are
>> readers supposed to solve the riddles to learn the underlying model?
>>
>
> Nonetheless, I didn't find it all that hard to write working code, and
> I'm not much of a coder.

If the spec author or an implementer knows at least one model that
fits all the requirements, it'd be nice to show it to the public.

Zhong Yu