Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3-03

Rifaat Shekh-Yusef via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 01 February 2023 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEE8C14EB19 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:19:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZA23k4elsEpG for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:19:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA7DC14EB14 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:19:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1pNC3F-000EH6-B3 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:17:21 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:17:21 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1pNC3F-000EH6-B3@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1pNC3E-000EG9-B5 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:17:20 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1pNC3A-008WvE-Vh for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:17:20 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FB9C17CEA1; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:17:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.7.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Message-ID: <167525382753.58103.2195829885696131977@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 04:17:07 -0800
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.223.129.194; envelope-from=noreply@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO=2.095, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1pNC3A-008WvE-Vh 6e0d771f5d8e0b1548325d7f58c7bb29
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3-03
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/167525382753.58103.2195829885696131977@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/50665
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reviewer: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

Straightforward document that describes the ORIGIN frame for HTTP3, 
does not introduce any new security considerations.