IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 26 February 2016 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFD11ACE05 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:35:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9bRlFuaf364 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:34:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4451C1ACE01 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:34:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aZCr6-0002Bt-HV for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:30:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:30:28 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aZCr6-0002Bt-HV@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1aZCr0-0001s1-GH for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:30:22 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1aZCqx-0004ic-OF for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:30:21 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8A5322E271; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:29:51 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <56CFFE31.6090503@greenbytes.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:29:48 +1100
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12592576-7F89-4309-B97D-753C9402CE7B@mnot.net>
References: <20160209074851.32332.24065.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20160209182822.C37A959F@welho-filter2.welho.com> <B7164F24-DDA1-4753-8A8B-04809B1965FF@mnot.net> <CAC4RtVCCExJNE0y8480vC1W56NP4XhzfvLs+ASh1Qy-UcDPBNw@mail.gmail.com> <C2145C5A-0255-43F9-A44A-F6C7974CDD4C@mnot.net> <CABkgnnW3-c1qaC_N2UP5TLnPS0rrOYjOYFb4nhUzfQ_8AFsTJA@mail.gmail.com> <072D900D-422E-4168-8DCF-51A739BC9E5A@mnot.net> <CABkgnnWAbKY8RZ5gvjPan3M_-XpjFSau0yDN97H=CfLb0DNL2g@mail.gmail.com> <2DDC5527-43AC-4BD2-8ED9-F68D747A7E0C@mnot.net> <56CFFE31.6090503@greenbytes.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.359, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aZCqx-0004ic-OF 8635a09e04cd3943cde4d241d8be8c93
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/12592576-7F89-4309-B97D-753C9402CE7B@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31104
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 26 Feb 2016, at 6:26 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2016-02-26 01:56, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> I've taken a stab at this:
>>   https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/f1024d233157e
>> 
>> Please review.
>> 
>> Cheers,
> 
> That says:
> 
>>   For the purposes of this document, "reasonable assurances" can be
>>   established through use of a TLS-based protocol with the certificate
>>   checks defined in [RFC2818].  Other means of establishing them MUST
>>   be documented in an RFC that updates this specification.  Clients MAY
>>   impose additional criteria for establishing reasonable assurances.
> 
> As far as I understand, this is a hook for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-03, which is currently labeled "experimental". It is my understanding that experimental RFCs will have a hard time "updating" a standards-track RFC, though...

Barry, any insights here? 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status