Re: #302, was: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (also #302)
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sun, 05 February 2012 21:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C115921F8478 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:23:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PzYbdAl7DKB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:23:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CD021F8471 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Ru9XU-0002Se-0g for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:22:24 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Ru9XH-0002R0-Uw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:22:11 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Ru9XF-00042v-KD for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:22:11 +0000
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.240.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E6F422E247; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 16:21:46 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F2EDA82.5010105@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:21:43 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <907315FC-AE96-43DF-8823-D7C03C259728@mnot.net>
References: <E7DE53B9-C374-4C9B-81D2-1F35BFCC174F@mnot.net> <F0C6395C-9555-49AB-BEE9-055B41DC0160@mnot.net> <4F2EDA82.5010105@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Ru9XF-00042v-KD b117ba584e10341c8ea374037641218e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #302, was: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (also #302)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/907315FC-AE96-43DF-8823-D7C03C259728@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/12318
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Ru9XU-0002Se-0g@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:22:24 +0000
Works for me. On 06/02/2012, at 6:37 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-07-17 02:54, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> ... >>> * Why is the "If the client is sending data..." section in p2 8.4? Seems like this belongs in p1... >> >> This is now #302<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/302> (editorial) >> ... > > Proposal: move into "6.2.4 Closing Connections on Error". > > See <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/302/302.diff> > > Best regards, Julian -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Generic semantics for the 400 status code Mark Nottingham
- Re: Generic semantics for the 400 status code Willy Tarreau
- Re: Generic semantics for the 400 status code Mark Nottingham
- Re: Generic semantics for the 400 status code Willy Tarreau
- #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (… Mark Nottingham
- Re: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status co… Mark Nottingham
- Re: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status co… Julian Reschke
- #302, was: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 st… Julian Reschke
- Re: #302, was: #303: Generic semantics for the 40… Mark Nottingham
- Re: #302, was: #303: Generic semantics for the 40… Julian Reschke
- #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (… Julian Reschke
- Re: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status co… Mark Nottingham