Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?

Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org> Mon, 18 February 2013 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC76221F8754 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:27:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.412
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.412 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.188, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1pQzTln9Hqh for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595C421F8519 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U7GRh-0005dE-E6 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:27:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:27:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U7GRh-0005dE-E6@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>) id 1U7GRZ-0005cV-E4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:27:01 +0000
Received: from mailhub.opengroupware.org ([213.211.192.144]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>) id 1U7GRY-0008Is-4g for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:27:01 +0000
Received: from localhost (mailhub.opengroupware.org [213.211.192.144]) by mailhub.opengroupware.org (OPENGROUPWARE.ORG MAILHUB) with ESMTP id E03992282A2; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:26:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at opengroupware.org
Received: from mailhub.opengroupware.org ([213.211.192.144]) by localhost (mailhub.opengroupware.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bEDxEbEbkS5K; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:26:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.1.4] (c-76-102-118-183.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.102.118.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhub.opengroupware.org (OPENGROUPWARE.ORG MAILHUB) with ESMTPSA id 7603B2281E2; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:26:35 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
In-Reply-To: <999F9463-660A-42FC-A11C-39CDE95CC616@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:26:34 -0800
Cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D70BFCAB-D2C1-4C66-994F-0C53F6C66581@opengroupware.org>
References: <CAMm+LwiF6EM8_aQgUm=nPS5XqaG25iRGNke_rnHTM1vTGMXdfg@mail.gmail.com> <A6A82B6EF92590887D2A23D5@cyrus.local> <D9118B58-F53F-4F75-8292-2B990172E234@opengroupware.org> <CABP7RbcX2OqttZuYeuYxhyOgE_ax0M67L1ywPy_VDpW1upM69Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNeWDBTBYJ0P-URbO5avbUno5etKid10RM+dRwDWAUys2w@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfVvZnYPPsRvzmC0BtCiPBxQmYXHTRKtq8XE7Z2wY2EfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYioRAOEbjU32yEaJuWDAySiZF=OfKXcF-8esqTP0uqwtQ@mail.gmail.com> <968F329C-B6CF-4129-B816-DC56C834A4A4@opengroupware.org> <CAA4WUYgGiJmtbswzmXWi-Ob+1HmoGnMhwr+9j9b5KS5OVQQdjQ@mail.gmail.com> <2DA0834D-C0B7-4A26-B6AD-B5789D0CFA3B@opengroupware.org> <999F9463-660A-42FC-A11C-39CDE95CC616@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=213.211.192.144; envelope-from=helge.hess@opengroupware.org; helo=mailhub.opengroupware.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.556, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1U7GRY-0008Is-4g e7d29037ee20dd7f604cf39f36c89b9e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/D70BFCAB-D2C1-4C66-994F-0C53F6C66581@opengroupware.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16653
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Helge et al,
> 
> If you'd like to pursue this, I'd suggest that the folks who are interested get together and make a more complete proposal, e.g., as an Internet-Draft. Developing an approach like this on-list isn't going to use your time or others' well.

Fair enough ;-)

hh