Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2013 22:36 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAF511E8163 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.985
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.614, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UfpwIOXQQvYj for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CB211E816F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V1lBo-00065a-1a for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:36:16 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:36:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V1lBo-00065a-1a@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1V1lBe-00064p-7N for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:36:06 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1V1lBd-0002yT-J5 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:36:06 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m46so942092wev.36 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LOoUtGsyphrJtWvrmHJ5Jl0foHxjt6PveErmX22TBAQ=; b=tOi8AN5oevSWVHv7Mv45qP9C7UkN/Ew3crPcZ/yMcP04fvPXUBF2L7IeYu9n6dwUM2 9gnPJicV2Of4i1jUilZKi2XNw2JsX63VaLhgiSdN87nlfGJilt0ZFfCYHgfc0yYluubo oVn3c6XvJ4F6zPFW0sxCPDUbFIpSiAEVe2pZRGh5/7RsJCaIrZSZDKkaLB/e9XT5Hvts 001HfxWmTmONt0vS3Ph3XoB7Ga5MJW+/70uVn1ucQecnPfwxfm4w2RzwHsrM8LsXaIWJ 1NPkU+F2gMKIosqV2039oToLGD6urcnzOZtfX6G5kt2K5X4YjIxNUsVls8KAXxyRLfsh o/yg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.92.1 with SMTP id ci1mr590200wib.14.1374618939465; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAP+FsNfauVPhGZH31_LFeQKOuPF0KcYKp7U4qMBtDUsv-Ja-cQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+KJw_5PcUxBiUnQ00=G2C4Q6MnaB=hpNDk+9eTeZMs3Lz-CpA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNf7YBDfO_=fW7nPHXdUi0F+0+4S2AUm_T2gHtqYhER8MA@mail.gmail.com> <20130723190419.GA25817@LK-Perkele-VII> <CAP+FsNc5tef8WRCaH-_6z5se=vVPscSQ3+GfEF0T02q8oKq6WA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWx5d_3U+tFQYG68+NCGC3Q2Hfm_PD0hgALeawb+PY-ZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNfauVPhGZH31_LFeQKOuPF0KcYKp7U4qMBtDUsv-Ja-cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:35:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV7ZZ_MWeuP2cDKombNWJJahES02XYTJh0OJY7yo17ytQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, Gábor Molnár <gabor.molnar@sch.bme.hu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.177; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f177.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.648, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1V1lBd-0002yT-J5 2ddc4ab9a33aefd4d25b2a1e3e3b5f28
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnV7ZZ_MWeuP2cDKombNWJJahES02XYTJh0OJY7yo17ytQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18896
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 23 July 2013 15:21, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: >> We've done a lot to protect resources on a server, but I don't think >> that a client is able to limit the commitments it has to make in order >> to continue to use a connection. > > Given the above, do you still feel that way? :) You're a server guy. That mostly just reads like a "it's clients, who cares, they can deal with it". I'll hold my opinion until the client folks reply.
- MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Gábor Molnár
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Martin Thomson
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE James M Snell
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Martin Thomson
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Roberto Peon
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Roberto Peon
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Martin Thomson
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Roberto Peon
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Martin Thomson
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Roberto Peon
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Martin Thomson
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Roberto Peon
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Leif Hedstrom
- Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE Gábor Molnár