Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)

Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> Wed, 04 March 2015 19:15 UTC

Resent-Message-Id: <E1YTEiP-000106-FQ@frink.w3.org>
X-From_: demianbrecht@gmail.com Fri Feb 27 18:33:25 2015
X-Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <demianbrecht@gmail.com>) id 1YRPj3-0008Gg-DM for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:33:25 +0000
X-Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <demianbrecht@gmail.com>) id 1YRPj2-0002ee-5n for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:33:25 +0000
X-Received: by pdbfl12 with SMTP id fl12so22860199pdb.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:32:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=hFmrqI95tf4K9uaNHxwqYN8h/tF9aTtUENodZF4C9FU=; b=Sz5qgdawSGFrP8bWMpiSPkwWcibCu50zvSyWJ+GzBB26q+miIbi1c5pwOogGqzwavY s681NE2Ng/W4BZHJ0ddqtWweXTIEa093brj3SlNe0B8mg7kPqJgY/1PIomQqXKRCXQfO 8wjcjPblsuciSV6x0htCrGK7GmrCTqAOwE0g5P2EGOXRUgrRspAYTqEI6J/QVKQhPnb9 rtdqO2/tqYiFhIqfA9W3mrQwCx1oEmSyY3C02MMexEv3hFf/MOrjkPBkymogvqwynPbE f7GAf65t5TpVqfpTe0eORkyChs3bt7B2iumpQ4fkttNRQaajRZJL80jUgu2mkZb0ySae zUVA==
X-Received: by 10.70.54.198 with SMTP id l6mr26559464pdp.74.1425061977059; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:32:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: from darthballs.van.demonware.net ([72.2.49.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm4700598pdh.9.2015.02.27.10.32.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E33436E4-B416-4BBF-BC49-A730808B5D50"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b5
From: Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F99C498F-C472-43D6-8346-2E13D522F6F1@gbiv.com>
Old-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:32:55 -0800
Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <4FB15C6C-4ADB-4979-B534-96E191E3DFF4@gmail.com>
References: <20150227052622.BD23A181B3D@rfc-editor.org> <F99C498F-C472-43D6-8346-2E13D522F6F1@gbiv.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.192.181; envelope-from=demianbrecht@gmail.com; helo=mail-pd0-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YRPj2-0002ee-5n 2b586c7916e9a0d6136e6d9599d1e186
Old-X-Envelope-To: ietf-http-wg
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:33:28 +0000
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Feb 27 13:33:29 2015
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9996
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 252684 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 54f0b87980501804284693
ReSent-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:11:58 -0500
ReSent-From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
ReSent-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
ReSent-Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
ReSent-User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/4FB15C6C-4ADB-4979-B534-96E191E3DFF4@gmail.com>
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28882
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On Feb 27, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> What we
> have here is a summary of the field's semantics given the message framing
> algorithm, as described in the remainder of that section and 3.3.3.

Thanks for that and the consideration, the distinction in the intent of the paragraphs does indeed clear up the confusion.

Attachment: signature.asc

[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) RFC Errata System
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Mark Nottingham
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Willy Tarreau
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Amos Jeffries
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Roy T. Fielding
[Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (4281) RFC Errata System
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Demian Brecht
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Demian Brecht

Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)

Attachment: signature.asc