Re: Comments/Issues on P1

Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk> Tue, 24 April 2012 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA5421F872D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SrRcmupo4yiM for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D341421F8686 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SMhzf-0000pF-NI for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:49:31 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>) id 1SMhzV-0000ni-MG for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:49:21 +0000
Received: from mailex.mailcore.me ([94.136.40.61]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>) id 1SMhzK-0005RJ-4b for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:49:19 +0000
Received: from [81.134.152.4] (helo=xxx.corp.velocix.com) by mail6.atlas.pipex.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>) id 1SMhyy-0000yL-EW; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:48:48 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <668C75FF-C3DF-486B-9AAF-CD9159BA3A44@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:48:45 +0100
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, John Sullivan <jsullivan@velocix.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <36CCFFB0-9948-4D79-9C01-B8FE9D8BFC00@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
References: <2D4DB009-5EB1-41CB-854D-641E40C3010C@niven-jenkins.co.uk> <668C75FF-C3DF-486B-9AAF-CD9159BA3A44@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailcore-Auth: 9600544
X-Mailcore-Domain: 172912
Received-SPF: none client-ip=94.136.40.61; envelope-from=ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk; helo=mailex.mailcore.me
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1SMhzK-0005RJ-4b adba9ffe7ef246a81366ef5e2b0a685a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comments/Issues on P1
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/36CCFFB0-9948-4D79-9C01-B8FE9D8BFC00@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13472
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SMhzf-0000pF-NI@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:49:31 +0000

Mark,

On 24 Apr 2012, at 08:21, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Hi Ben,
> 
> Just so it's clear: p1 is NOT in WGLC right now; you're welcome to review it, but the document is still in flux. 

Understood.

> If you think there are substantive issues in the document (i.e., things that are not likely to be changed in an editorial rewrite), you're welcome to raise issues now, but it may be more productive to wait until it settles a bit.
> 
> Finally, if/when you do raise issues, please include the document revision you're making comments upon, and we prefer substantive issues to be raised one-per-email.

Apologies, I forgot to include that. John is reviewing -19 of all the drafts. I didn't put the p1 comments in separate emails because it isn't in WG LC yet but I will do that from now on (and continue to put any further comments on p4-p7 in separate mails).

Ben