Header compression question: duplicate header entry and current index on computing working set
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com> Wed, 17 July 2013 15:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD66621E805F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O8h0UWwJLlnK for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762E221E8050 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UzU6Z-0001l8-JA for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:57:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:57:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UzU6Z-0001l8-JA@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>) id 1UzU6Q-0001kJ-Ga for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:57:18 +0000
Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>) id 1UzU6P-0002Bo-9B for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:57:18 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u16so4404866iet.37 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=AVvy1yjEn5286gOOX6pWZG1JwM7Oddrn4px54BQbV0g=; b=TEnVW1rXKENUqWo/BRl6r1kDiQUdkJih1Dvp1niN+laZ83X1BsjdvC+RLG0Da2qhDe v0TO4yYqs6EyPYOyeRSY1bz0TFWPFx1ZMDY89xvKNw+AIwuD/ZJs2sgBwm5Sm+8/7fkf bdE5gevcjnvQt34jJ2zASadaRCBRwyfKE7YqKQyX2t6unOPJO6F8CPWMTwfjiyDTGRco XDZXkVrBBpe0RUnyYNNAE/W+Dj95qtTu4RpdtvLB9UXJysv1T0HW/7fjoV2+Ey9W4sr9 AZbQxBZFW033n+7LgJ9gK5IK3BJzQ6R/t8x34G2bwf7yyk6tk+rqzxJ0xhoDebz2utte A2yQ==
X-Received: by 10.50.49.48 with SMTP id r16mr1563247ign.30.1374076611355; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.32.103 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:56:31 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPyZ6=+sFhOuSSE6OEB9bJAMYm0zt4SJwgmdMjUTprmiAj3ujg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bdc1c00506e7d04e1b72484"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.178; envelope-from=tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com; helo=mail-ie0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.807, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UzU6P-0002Bo-9B 0eee757d0196a7f985de8c0fee135332
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Header compression question: duplicate header entry and current index on computing working set
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPyZ6=+sFhOuSSE6OEB9bJAMYm0zt4SJwgmdMjUTprmiAj3ujg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18824
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hi, The header compression draft 3.2 says the implementation must accept duplicate entry in header table. In 3.4, to compute working set from reference set of headers, the index of entry in header table is required. The question is, when the duplicate entries are in the header table, which index is used as the index of working set? My understanding of reference set of headers is that it is just a set of name/value pairs without index. To compute working set from it, one has to check each pair in header table and get its index in it. Best regards, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Header compression question: duplicate header ent… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: Header compression question: duplicate header… Martin Thomson
- Re: Header compression question: duplicate header… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- RE: Header compression question: duplicate header… Mike Bishop
- Re: Header compression question: duplicate header… Jeff Pinner
- Re: Header compression question: duplicate header… Roberto Peon
- Re: Header compression question: duplicate header… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa