Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Fri, 27 February 2015 07:16 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7921A8AF9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 23:16:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEKi8jfDAQEz for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 23:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1E21A8A03 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 23:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YRF6p-0006BK-Sq for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:13:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:13:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YRF6p-0006BK-Sq@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1YRF6i-0006A7-8B for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:13:08 +0000
Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1YRF6h-00048P-50 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:13:08 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id t1R7CR9L030546; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:12:27 +0100
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:12:27 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, demianbrecht@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20150227071227.GA30543@1wt.eu>
References: <20150227052622.BD23A181B3D@rfc-editor.org> <A815F695-E6DF-416E-992C-899EC4FD9641@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A815F695-E6DF-416E-992C-899EC4FD9641@mnot.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.068, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YRF6h-00048P-50 a220a6b6a0d5bb9318a165c55e2bc358
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20150227071227.GA30543@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28864
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:36:16PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: > I think Roy wrote this text, but from my standpoint, it's REJECT -- > Content-Length defines message length under these conditions no matter what > the UA should or should not do. Agreed. The proposal makes the text confusing while the original text makes it quite clear how a message body's size is determined. Willy
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Willy Tarreau
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Amos Jeffries
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Roy T. Fielding
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (4281) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Demian Brecht
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Demian Brecht