[Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 26 November 2014 20:00 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01D91A1B5A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:00:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_MEN=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T9wgpQxZ7GQN for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0561A1B54 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XtiiP-0006ca-7K for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:57:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:57:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XtiiP-0006ca-7K@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1XtiiF-0006aW-4K for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:57:19 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1XtiiE-0001vZ-55 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:57:19 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B3D5C181CE7; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:56:39 -0800 (PST)
To: fielding@gbiv.com, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, mnot@mnot.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: simon.schueppel@googlemail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20141126195639.B3D5C181CE7@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:56:39 -0800
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.944, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XtiiE-0001vZ-55 27cd36b662f8f03c68455ef85d430c79
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20141126195639.B3D5C181CE7@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28172
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4189 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Simon Schueppel <simon.schueppel@googlemail.com> Section: 3.2 Original Text ------------- header-field = field-name ":" OWS field-value OWS field-name = token field-value = *( field-content / obs-fold ) field-content = field-vchar [ 1*( SP / HTAB ) field-vchar ] field-vchar = VCHAR / obs-text obs-fold = CRLF 1*( SP / HTAB ) ; obsolete line folding ; see Section 3.2.4 Corrected Text -------------- header-field = field-name ":" FWS field-value FWS field-name = token FWS = field-ows field-value = [ field-vchar *( field-ows field-vchar ) ] field-vchar = VCHAR / obs-text field-ows = *( SP / HTAB ) *obs-fold obs-fold = CRLF 1*( SP / HTAB ) ; obsolete line folding ; see Section 3.2.4 Notes ----- the field-value rule given in Section 3.2 will not recognize several strings recognized by specific header rules. Examples: - ", , ," recognized by legacy list rule - "abrowser/0.001 (C O M M E N T)" recognized by User-Agent rule - "gzip , chunked" recognized by Transfer-Encoding rule - etc. General Problem: the specified field-value rule does not allow single field-vchar surrounded by whitespace anywhere Further Notes: -what the authors propably wanted to say: a string of octets is a field-value if, and only if: -it is *( field-vchar / SP / HTAB / obs-fold ) -if it is not empty, it starts and ends with field-vchar -the suggested correction was designed according to these criteria Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7230 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-26) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing Publication Date : June 2014 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Zhong Yu
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Barry Leiba
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Barry Leiba
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Zhong Yu
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Barry Leiba
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Amos Jeffries
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Zhong Yu
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Zhong Yu
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Willy Tarreau
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Zhong Yu
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Barry Leiba
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7230 (4189) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Willy Tarreau
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Walter H.
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4189) Julian Reschke