IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Status code 422 in http-core uses the term `entity`. Should we use `representation` ?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 15 May 2019 06:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D6F120288 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xRvEBnXD1eg8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C761120232 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hQncE-0002a5-9R for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:42:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 06:42:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hQncE-0002a5-9R@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1hQncA-0002ZG-Nq for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:42:10 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1hQnc9-0005hZ-64 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:42:10 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1557902505; bh=qX0O1sTkuvyp/8PY0gPMgKYHkeUcdwl2HywtQflxES0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BCQQTHc7t9nEnaXVu2iNHdPhekSXbXe7rlLjY/Df8HH6JtrBIX8EaFCkaF6ftxBBj JAiFU9cqsFX8XTYVU+8dkHfqpTuXZxldsOUqK0G7FWGjeOTcnLHwMbpv/REN+hRABo wgti2WCEblqR65EIQnJbCBLvBzRu8zyYtKxzadKM=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.148.39]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfAog-1h275X2mNO-00Oq4g; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:41:45 +0200
To: Roberto Polli <roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CAMRHeuyKsYvHYz-x=WqO_iJ6hCehnvkeO6XeEtda7msCvC30Fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <01d4f67f-a65e-a2d6-86d2-435969544485@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 08:41:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMRHeuyKsYvHYz-x=WqO_iJ6hCehnvkeO6XeEtda7msCvC30Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:5aZXfvwe02GJa5TgmTkIhRV5f/mQIYLyAJ/6NR8tIPR1LS21YQw JXO3VJ2PNmTJElN+nqyjdO/pzKHsO+fmG2oQpUh2p3OCAmvfcXEeTjWFZ4tSw6JcMqx3IIz ekeBdbiTUlkJk4Cr0fKH47rGwoHZ3uqcfUrhDyKvNri0UDRlSNBQlqffg2umYAg5WayFS7U JNR7S+RJgjHBbHoiePDzg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:CMMzwKNYe+c=:iaRevKLujigCqMhRSovUCD cWU2JctqyLqcDnF9pegK5DRgTMTRv/AQ3i5jJAGV96d3v6tm2hkW1ZPAiTpvaxKVJO+suYg++ O4Jtt17T9Nh7tPbjt5QP9STstPUX3T622IlpYxo7UR1W+UKsUFJ4GM6fJRHbiR8PMk1vgSsQm 06Qnz7g1hdmKdKSDJnIxNIaqXozZBX+7dnv4Yhn4PuLhaNgI6feWmXlUmW9kmasK2bfmViOC4 YMo40BTNXvEe0u1NFH6O8/oJsa+BRoD4MBLyhNVM16NKfpEdqB2N4+mvwSTNqUOsPJ+kf3ukz JLEX+huue/CoQABnxcBWxlfLuGqQilXiOKognq3FktPKQ8xcvtb2Rg7impORTpPtFSu4ADZz3 tRtJ/YRlFtMVUrl1vGLW0X9B8sBFuu0RzMDz7e3C5Xs7x+Ff/KyIFefVdTOfL8UNS//4K5mi5 DgJpH1Wdbqa9zjY+uapt8vwAsSp927OwN1uigJA79/VR5gdnGhX8uTTxzktw5pPhtgeB8bDoF +QZkuLDy58khIzf4EoKGG1EYzt2J2i6REjTSiiNq8woFf9tMHtt/Qd2TFNN1LI4nNXmE6d8kB s8UdmFkow9ig8B4SoU8aha2HY6hx4iCNtp6vqLBS7H/wKmeX5sX4NRyodDXfPwSx2OJ40P9m7 lwBj3uMyySil1qBN7Xjd24snbA6Lt1V5eOpnnEyVsEJ9QVI1e5/scJh1xasSTnWxcuJLkDX38 A9gfjUbHX9us1JrASvC6+lHW4GBvEvmlk+RxH5FickhPC7HnJtPYvUi+yYwpNCZneWBOq1mpI 9ERt+jhYdKqnjU3SG2ncNaqw4Tdx08+8kNX9OqhPUZnPEauo1jA/q7axoYUa1faJ/RB3is7sw PuMoM00k76am/8QzdNFBEqaNW1Hxo456ZbNgE+Gzcozf4ClnXa57im31e+lKaUnLeXXqdPVNR /uLkvvIMa0w==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.351, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1hQnc9-0005hZ-64 a1baa8deb2c734716d6345ba35aba9f1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Status code 422 in http-core uses the term `entity`. Should we use `representation` ?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/01d4f67f-a65e-a2d6-86d2-435969544485@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36645
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 14.05.2019 17:38, Roberto Polli wrote:
> Hi @all,
>
> while reading httpbis-semantics I noted that:
>
> - Status code 422 uses the term `entity`
>
> I filed an issue:
>
> - https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/224
>
> My proposals:
>
> - it should use the term `representation`

"enclosed representation"

> - the definition should expand the original statements which are tied to webdav
>    so that it could be more generic

Please be more specific.

> - we could add one or two examples with the correct 422 usage

I'm not against examples, but we currently have none in this section.
Adding just a few for 422 would be weird.

> How would you manage it?

I'll take care of it.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email