#44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 17 March 2015 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CA11A0056 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIP-4a5IHIPH for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48C51A004B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YXkPH-0007yj-8l for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:51:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:51:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YXkPH-0007yj-8l@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1YXkPB-0007xx-Qp for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:51:05 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1YXkPA-0007EJ-Ty for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:51:05 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.154] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C81822E200 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2A565EA2-D713-478F-A771-C08202657EC2@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:50:38 +1100
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.439, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_IRA=-2, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-0.1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YXkPA-0007EJ-Ty a0e61d32aed521ab0d17ed2fd98d94ce
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: #44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/2A565EA2-D713-478F-A771-C08202657EC2@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28978
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/44>

Patrick and Julian point out that we’re not explicit about the semantics of ALTSVC on server-initiated streams.

Any objection to stating that they MUST be ignored by recipients?

Regards,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/