alt-svc issue #83: Alt-Svc Header - hop by hop
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 20 September 2015 11:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B181B4C59 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hy6avFQi3Vyw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7CC1B4C58 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZddBg-00085b-1l for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 11:53:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 11:53:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZddBg-00085b-1l@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1ZddBa-00084p-PG for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 11:53:38 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1ZddBZ-00015l-8l for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 11:53:38 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.67.189]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MgbvP-1ZGIuC3rAl-00O2FC for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:53:08 +0200
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <55FE9E24.9080804@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:53:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:acVe9n/qmvT7MtqmRohPJWjOus5FQUR9i6Ci4zj2vEWcojaqDOg xz1yF16qNZY4vREuPnAJkUG6QRzjybDwJBNydPq29cDe+iPPeiALBS0UBlhfmhFMpNcsIH7 gyq9kpHYhWtoVs/31RLdaz/RAqRUh+DdfR4O8NWVblUo02Z6hRHNxQPRbHtvnavGSPFWyMD Iqj6rDUeJSfiieVbFhwMA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:CEmIkGDnvvk=:u+Hw44qjT7qNdGCUu8NUd6 FY9uuJug9vtk+pM/TY9OfqJFaFUHsqAbWsZzRfwpG8mmpPb69HNdxd0A6vpK+ApJNwseKju4T Et5Fm3ZCnI3eZq67KNJCFbx2uyjGC2toZHxV5hL9Lcf+25k1QsfuvIjZ2Rz8rrt0bpR3P325o ww8104PbGPWG3cyqRp7k0y2GTM1FMnn+jZ/IF6F9r5ZaYZD6yj0/j39zuRT0sLWpTMY9b0Kki l63arwRJ38LA+6rCVlwbbfrzILxA3f5fa2OgnAJgsCUZ6UG+RJgJkOu0kxqDzW+Pawj416Xfg bz/VpI7y2e5/hsfOoSqvRt9owxaXm8zkVbo+N5L4Qjqpl6xfCL5s9M41Cbln96QzCUGdHMWlr Zh34LYEc40BLvKUl7ZScRxH1WEgbFm0GCQCMzOETBn6l4fiSXFeRB+4wfQWNkHmA6kARoFi2z W0Aaxp4EvzDru3jksAHcqXrIuzYD3kPZuvaarSemuRF627UEGs6xctdwIwbBIFtpZCAW7rwt+ ephy4XnJWWxww+mrL00ZNetVaahbz26nx0ZeH5PSm4hxFpbRCVOvNuUCWPiDXu1b2bCp3gKqS nhy+TjkJ9T/ab5agm68WOAZ4YTPq9Dj+UmE+IQppwpC+rSRezT0qVygFzbXmNPLQG5XzM+gzH /ix/SbzEM25mnhLdueNZoU18IOXITwUVZ5WthOBUinylnb+PzFGmrRSU7dO4L0lLp4Vv6f4cf 1xHEKhaf0niuvi1qNshMS3SXpufEaHCpOfMbhA==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.073, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ZddBZ-00015l-8l 2b994d21ad58c77289ff7c9e33438118
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: alt-svc issue #83: Alt-Svc Header - hop by hop
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/55FE9E24.9080804@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30234
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
mnot: "Discussed in Prague; end-to-end header is useful in the OppSec use case, and it doesn't need to be consistent with the frame. Feeling in room was to close with no action." So can we close this issue? Best regards, Julian
- alt-svc issue #83: Alt-Svc Header - hop by hop Julian Reschke
- Re: alt-svc issue #83: Alt-Svc Header - hop by hop Mark Nottingham