IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 19 April 2013 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF41121F9079 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQ82yPJLjLMJ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D2621F8F25 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UT4ti-0004ui-0E for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:34:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:34:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UT4ti-0004ui-0E@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1UT4td-0004u1-3C for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:34:09 +0000
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.141]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1UT4tR-0002XM-Cf for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:34:09 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=773; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1366353237; x=1367562837; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=imZ8bngBkSjo33nrXWvbNy35vKy0hqbZcTkrNiDrtcw=; b=Fyly4QZ9hS88/gRScy7atgcxzUDhgz9hAJtqIrXIbPqJ5iB6JSRN7VIx II81uZcUCcV77NzpnKSywBvTIZpouQvBedy7xu9jIgM6iMwRXkwmJ66+x t5zO7iHxb7zqjbWN5hWwBhTT+nGa90do6raJJZZbjX3JbEwlWbLyV0ITo g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai4FAJzkcFGQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABQgwY2gmpHvTGBCBZ0gh8BAQEEI1UBEAsOCgICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiBAMqwiSZYEjjXUHgjSBEwOXB5EUgw06
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,507,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="82076665"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2013 06:33:28 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-101-239.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-101-239.cisco.com [10.61.101.239]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3J6XQUJ010832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:33:26 GMT
Message-ID: <5170E537.3080609@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:33:27 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
CC: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, "Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)" <robby.simpson@ge.com>, Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>, Jitu Padhye <padhye@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@skype.net>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
References: <516B8824.8040904@cisco.com> <DF8F6DB7E5D58B408041AE4D927B2F48CBB88103@CINURCNA14.e2k.ad.ge.com> <CAP+FsNfeUtKfOMPKriYP7Ak_YzsjEFKvprJOAQaxYP7_BxTBsw@mail.gmail.com> <cf53405c48dc431693573a9148776c8a@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOdDvNpidZwfMS_y_Hy56UjOaD9uNi-s=B9MErQSq4Msd3oBKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAB_+Fg7h_P3mR=dTQ1u6BroYwVm=TuqmEiZRivGAh1OG=Os8xA@mail.gmail.com> <5170C34C.3060200@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <5170C34C.3060200@mti-systems.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=144.254.224.141; envelope-from=lear@cisco.com; helo=ams-iport-2.cisco.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.263, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.702, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UT4tR-0002XM-Cf 697fa708356d73202840a94dd61adc3d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5170E537.3080609@cisco.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17355
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On this one point:

On 4/19/13 6:08 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
>
>> * It's always arguable on how valid the CWND is... but then, this is
>> true of any starting condition. So the question really is: Is past value
>> from some XXX time ago less/more wrong on average than starting with an
>> arbitrary constant?
>
> It is a great research question, and very interesting.
>
> The things to look at are what the impact of being wrong on different
> granularities is, and what the likelihood of being wrong at different
> granularities is.

And just as a reminder, Cisco has an open Request for Proposals[1] for
all things HTTP2, of which we would consider this part.

Eliot

[1]
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac50/ac207/crc_new/university/RFP/rfp13077.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email