IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7107)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Wed, 31 August 2022 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F49C15949C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n81rkiOu9MHp for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30DC5C152708 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1oTPxG-00FmNL-6L for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:48:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:48:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1oTPxG-00FmNL-6L@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1oTPxF-00FmM4-Bv for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:48:37 +0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de ([217.91.35.233]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1oTPxD-008CUm-Ob for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:48:37 +0000
Received: by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix, from userid 119) id F2484980A95; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:36:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] (unknown [91.61.54.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63823980A95; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:36:36 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <868d91de-6e0a-4573-b7bf-50e59606e51a@greenbytes.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:48:12 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, tpauly@apple.com
Cc: james.synge@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20220831154236.C5540AB20A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
In-Reply-To: <20220831154236.C5540AB20A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.91.35.233; envelope-from=julian.reschke@greenbytes.de; helo=mail.greenbytes.de
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1oTPxD-008CUm-Ob 8db58c2fbc924403928446a65326964b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7107)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/868d91de-6e0a-4573-b7bf-50e59606e51a@greenbytes.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40362
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 31.08.2022 um 17:42 schrieb RFC Errata System:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110,
> "HTTP Semantics".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7107
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: James Synge <james.synge@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 6.5.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1
> allows a trailer section to be sent after the content
> (Section 7.1.2 of [HTTP/1.1]).
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1
> allows a trailer section to be sent after the content
> (Section ?.?.? of [HTTP/1.1]).
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Section 7.1.2 does not exist. It isn't clear to me which section is the intended target of the reference.
> ...

It does exist. See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112#section-7.1.2>.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email