IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices

Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com> Wed, 15 October 2014 05:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64741A0271 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.112
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCZB6ntoijqR for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE651A026A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XeGop-000282-Pg for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:08:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:08:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XeGop-000282-Pg@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>) id 1XeGoj-000272-1G for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:08:09 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>) id 1XeGoi-0000Ql-6T for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:08:08 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id uz6so426561obc.29 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kgkHchwaXzD8H6mi3DdpOCGRQ9aWwYWEyspnWi/ptN0=; b=AAnimPCyhPtLxgQVn5d6cn+NvK1A08lJ9DcnPN+XzaSPSSYTIXAd6MzhTNSr/4KCIF enoL+2ted7Le0NvbRIkC3y1n4yYw7dBSflM2wTfoU7WLeQYmKrdlXgJ8hq/F1EQuAJir GLvc0Aixl/RJCTWinSdPir79x2C3TV2LEtJrtZFtWhVZWmb0YusRU/UAcOIgb/KXmmYZ JjJ7tjHNumOM6RqI9XlwYCdN0zANkfbfZTwwTRBqWdCWl//zbqRnEmy6CdO3PjDcCjop 7X3LEwJToWgb9lCpuBGbnVykCG4BkvJMi4ib5u/97JEgJ2lnSrsDUeQXFDObSI9A0Xra GeOw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.63.79 with SMTP id e15mr8542785oes.31.1413349661900; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.17.132 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20141015050103.GA31906@1wt.eu>
References: <CA+pLO_jkN67HLT7oup+FcYVY+RZ7ckhpY2gGy=TAsr2UUMnVVA@mail.gmail.com> <987FB86A-EF8B-4CD1-A9A7-52A9163E8CB3@mnot.net> <EBB30C88-7EBD-400F-9591-B646B4D3687B@mnot.net> <CAP+FsNeJU6aciA+UV3sQ318e4=fXxv9zZbsDZ1jXmYstz6XwaQ@mail.gmail.com> <E465C1C7-20DF-4F78-9936-9C914042920A@mnot.net> <20141013012326.GD13217@1wt.eu> <CAP+FsNci+YbQ9fP9LiJ1BBUSDryWOqi4A4YsKyORskY7pK0Fmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHzwyDuAeMJe_BW0kZkLUHRn6xAN8LO_uno_ZL0TmCLgSaYbkg@mail.gmail.com> <20141015050103.GA31906@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:07:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHzwyDvNc1OoAnPteSjfAew7ko1Rx3kTtJL19h9BWUJTwLngWQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.170; envelope-from=adrian.f.cole@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f170.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.661, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XeGoi-0000Ql-6T cecf37a28cc29402735204f35608f766
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAHzwyDvNc1OoAnPteSjfAew7ko1Rx3kTtJL19h9BWUJTwLngWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27607
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Yep. Thanks for being clearer than me. Willy. I didn't mean flipping
back as reintroducing the reference set. I'm actually quite happy
that's gone as a developer: it led to deleting some gnarly things.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:22:21PM -0700, Adrian Cole wrote:
>> If we agree that api stuff does in fact use a lot of non-standard
>> headers, and we believe flipping back doesn't maim normal web, could
>> that be a strong enough case to revert?
>
> Please to be clear, noone suggests to flip back to what we previously
> had, there's no question about reintroducing the reference set whose
> removal has considerably simplified developers' experience. The idea
> is just to ensure that *at least* some dynamic headers can be encoded
> with a single byte so that all the future headers that are not part of
> the static set are not penalized so much as what Jeff observes.
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status