Re: Preliminary agenda for the SF Interim

William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Tue, 04 June 2013 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935B221F9C8F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfjT7jcRxxuK for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBEB21F8551 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Ujvhw-0007z0-2D for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 18:11:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 18:11:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Ujvhw-0007z0-2D@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1Ujvhj-0007vt-Pl for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 18:11:31 +0000
Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1Ujvhe-0007KV-Pu for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 18:11:31 +0000
Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q19so417677qeb.32 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=h2aQRQZFGHadIFOH7OP0WG35AQaLow9VKAScs2Mhv8I=; b=lKpGvU9UsE43C2kluCEKKOGvT4wSWQTV8wPvnNkHKCsiNxcA6oDzI/2y6loc8MCyGH 1WV0nqxypI4mvxiVLBTN9Fe1U6r65AQ1pr9PSUChxgZz+JFWxLvfLsuDtJyQdCGR3kVg 6k/VLy9yjv9vkvIAh646U+59u7Ovqjxx7qUt/EEuGx5ncFp4WPoqByeLu1gaXMjuXovH 4oJDn6WFHFRkoJigcG8Do73mhu5/CzUNcxqnPmxTR/PyeXxvH5voM9hKUW18jDo3l80W drJnXXLuqurfPvR3t5VIcLNBwtIfpsdoYU/9HGSajtcMpobXJHTjU1KAKaYgmK/5Ycl7 9g0Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=h2aQRQZFGHadIFOH7OP0WG35AQaLow9VKAScs2Mhv8I=; b=T7WZcjdqi9C8lzOBNpq4f6L2owRbc5pZs6OWQj0eZ36fMb2wY4EMcOK3mRZu2Pezwg 8AEjXwQFebIejzkYz0ZqtJyQ0q179LQKouvn99FXechhvNyDRk7lAGgMe3XklRlrSVq1 oa4f3QnSr3XWZJQ1ngqD9Zva/qnELiOoFSz2A=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=h2aQRQZFGHadIFOH7OP0WG35AQaLow9VKAScs2Mhv8I=; b=mu9rbojw3FnK1lephHMUagB7Y4XczdyPqDrqoXIfbuO40BguWElsLEF+IHYXAsp2TB cI+Zw6DZDd8ydReUMfuCwHYeo/9BLYttjrQKdOx4ZDO+q5XtO7j3F7roUnI7EcZGKSs2 vzKVxzjT1x5Ee/dwHtaWSWzLwYX51tTCluUD7MQMIPGgV9wXFk67yz+j64W1LbtIAsrT YKhiidXF6UjF9h/PfjcOypRDiHJUTwl834g6Un53Mqo6WbRAgZYTvsiJHw2Jd9sSgtWL XsMOtZfbpNJYS5oLUOMs+IPU29cFalq/ML+f3rXym4uupDrgggAtYI+Tb8yklOtlFuGR hH9g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.143.79 with SMTP id t15mr9787178qcu.127.1370369460951; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.229.62.133 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbcpNs+jFVJDFM1P2Lm=qRp-LN_1Exv-vkxdLY9Qmqzw4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9167C0B2-1FFE-43C9-835D-8522F15378D8@mnot.net> <CABP7RbcpNs+jFVJDFM1P2Lm=qRp-LN_1Exv-vkxdLY9Qmqzw4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:11:00 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: p4aYLR11jHTcrjvj8snQkQjuLFE
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYisXB+4=wCLyUBRqd2wf7giMDr3qObo0ehczAAzNgD_FA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba30927eee9acb04de5800ce
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbdnnKjJRmNxZfCoHWVsBAgG9JA72XnJQVNy0bxCORqg6C7oYFJTKCytRgV5FK67gm4P/WtddclvR9c62oc68W2pVcyz9lhXY4mapnTFP6Pm6JQ30+0A4RfcDzG/781XqpXqONkbxhEgqIBjoZkHPxQ4Ew3Wog9qLqGfOUHUq/OQSYI3zPgHDw/tAyVKjMudOd1hBl
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.128.45; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-qe0-f45.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.468, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Ujvhe-0007KV-Pu 5f11c81f5c05f31ff229da950f86f754
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Preliminary agenda for the SF Interim
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYisXB+4=wCLyUBRqd2wf7giMDr3qObo0ehczAAzNgD_FA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18176
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I feel like we still have some open questions around stream lifetimes. If
we do not have consensus here yet, I think it'd be advisable to pencil in
time on the agenda to discuss this.


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:30 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > As you can probably guess, we haven't been able to get implementations
> moving before this Interim, but I'd very much like to exit it being able to
> get there quickly.
> >
> > With that in mind, I've asked the editors to publish a draft -03 by
> early next week, to give everyone enough time to review the draft.
> >
> > Likewise, I've asked Herve and Roberto to get their header proposal(s)
> lined up and ready for discussion at the F2F.
> >
>
> While I wasn't asked to have it "lined up and ready for discussion",
> the current bohe header proposal will be updated one more time before
> the F2F and will be ready for discussion. Specifically, the typed
> codecs portion is pretty much done and ready to go.
>
> > Please come into the meeting having read ALL of those documents
> carefully (once updated), as well as the issues list <
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues>gt;.
> >
> > If there are particular issues that you believe are important to get
> sorted out for the first implementation draft, please bring them up on-list
> BEFORE the meeting, so that we can make that time as productive as
> possible. The current list of such issues is <
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues?milestone=1&page=1&state=open>
> >
> > A _rough_ agenda for discussion:
> >
> > * Administrivia
> >    - Blue sheets
> >    - Introductions
> >    - Scribe Selection
> >    - Agenda Bashing
> >    - NOTE WELL
> >    - Ground rules for the meeting
> > * Document review [editors]
> >   - Open editors' questions
> > * Header compression
> > * Server push walkthrough
> >    * PUSH_PROMISE
> > * Flow Control overview
> > * Prioritisation review
> > * Upgrade / negotiation
> > * Other issue discussion
> >[snip]
>
> Frame sizing, Unknown frame handling (clarification of must-ignore
> rule), and max concurrent streams ought to be included as well.
>
> - James
>
>