Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00.txt
Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Thu, 05 March 2020 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECE63A080A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:43:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HVZOxCi5nso9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 006193A0802 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:43:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1j9uTz-0004eq-25 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:40:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:40:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1j9uTz-0004eq-25@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1j9uTr-0004e1-Av for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:40:19 +0000
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1j9uTp-0007kp-Io for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:40:19 +0000
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id x3so2442359wmj.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:40:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+KM3UgYDOUiXaBzkXRXBo+bQItrfwQsM9NUmx2q8Djg=; b=KOweHyeAHY2VlPLDzbzCpmuzLPi96yTGDOvWBunIKbsp/ukB3U2ejqydRoe2nrqR24 As9VXvfmAHGY1xU25mlkTnC/gNrfMRW3ZPXITz2cpWq3BjE/5ooHAkBhN8qu0tezY7dY qXL+MTIfEtIHfHOyy88oI36f4vbrALkIZs5M+Rz5/Ci82hPEgmSlAzcAGwJEFV0YTLlT 51DeddRpw2GgNIt+W5lsQkoLAUP9Bo5suddGYQys/2a/CXXcPzQDtrA67efLpKKdujh1 J8CRH5DOX1Spkmvf21f60ITyLkHktYdptUfPaty1HCCCwRP1ioouLcftXyxY631j1D6U 3D3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=+KM3UgYDOUiXaBzkXRXBo+bQItrfwQsM9NUmx2q8Djg=; b=X4ypHA3pK80l2H48QRKlmUgk3J+5CjU5WBQyZzbDnJLudBXrHhcCphLPArvJIjHotw uWVM5FhHYwx+f3PEdujZfCFaTw6q3HSgE219t8G7HO/x02Z2dpo0FFivIJ0maUzCsoL3 drrwmx3lfZEjiX7BLy3Tonq8THjksGRr861pfB2qZNuwhDdWQNwHlWj79AQ1rLC3uWW3 tHjy/IC6qYuHiUURhlSJLeHb9apWWJJC5w7fcDmgDyGcoWL2Z/JPGniaixpQQuj+Ygq3 aSNgArM9xHk3WT05Myn0xz2GY7EyqnIKP/MI1+7gdNYag+0c93y63zp3nr1PSy7lFsMA tPhg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0P9GKvgf3xQIQaz0xuV3oWMZKgkX1nqh8OVdRFZC9pnzGROPdb xZ1Q/pqJVGNmOU8EMTnEWEoFMf2UJ81adTKRsY5kF4Gh3VY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuh/R5smZnKypK3Gw9b9jRi7VXsNX/h7ljMiRYMJd6oWBJ/RNDuj95Qq8T6D2UvuS8ndlOlY6KqlWgMF7Glahk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:d8:: with SMTP id u24mr11020999wmm.165.1583430004676; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:40:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158342819915.14611.53810193547146190@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158342819915.14611.53810193547146190@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:39:53 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9obw90VweYQybVHSs=5MYJe8PUMt+adEAppLZ=QVPcKUew@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f49c7305a01f06fb"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32e; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32e.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1j9uTp-0007kp-Io 24d1cb13acc7b911510852d10b0bfe6d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9obw90VweYQybVHSs=5MYJe8PUMt+adEAppLZ=QVPcKUew@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37406
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hello WGs, Following adoption of draft-kazuho-httpbis-priority-04 by HTTPbis, Kazuho and I have published draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00 (see forwarded email). The major change in this draft relates to the urgency levels. Based on feedback and discussion, we have kept 8 levels (0-7 in descending order of priority) but have minimized the semantics. This allows a common urgency range, without being overly prescriptive on client's ability to use the range. Furthermore, the text describing how an intermediary might approach merging priority signals from client and server implied a weighting toward server signals; we have reduced the guidance and highlight that merging decision are a local decision. This draft version contains changes that reflect emerging WG consensus. However, the list of open issues is available on Github [1] and we encourage continued discussion, notably the debate on using frame vs. headers is still unresolved. Cheers Lucas [1] - https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/priorities ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <intrnet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:09 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00.txt To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Lucas Pardue < lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Lucas Pardue and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority Revision: 00 Title: Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Document date: 2020-03-05 Group: httpbis Pages: 19 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority Abstract: This document describes a scheme for prioritizing HTTP responses. This scheme expresses the priority of each HTTP response using absolute values, rather than as a relative relationship between a group of HTTP responses. This document defines the Priority header field for communicating the initial priority in an HTTP version-independent manner, as well as HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 frames for reprioritizing the responses. These share a common format structure that is designed to provide future extensibility. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-http… Lucas Pardue
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Ian Swett
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Lucas Pardue
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Ian Swett
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Lucas Pardue
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Ian Swett
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Roberto Peon
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Martin Thomson
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Ian Swett
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Lucas Pardue
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Ian Swett
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpb… Kazuho Oku