Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)

Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> Wed, 17 June 2020 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891743A0834 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yoav-ws.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z3j2ah2A6bdL for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C07DF3A0833 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jlUBk-0004xx-VH for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:16:57 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:16:56 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jlUBk-0004xx-VH@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <yoav@yoav.ws>) id 1jlUBj-0004x7-Qp for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:16:55 +0000
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <yoav@yoav.ws>) id 1jlUBh-0003DC-Io for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:16:55 +0000
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id i3so1988834ljg.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yoav-ws.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EI4mRStdafkoNtJ8fY+DRagx7mcRq+IkX+paBlxBeRo=; b=o0i81qB9vAjPTCyzaj8sQV+x3camXlTMNX5AJlQZoO6eyRCHF18Zaw/KcVAWG/VqDk 4p4vlpMVpIzsFMdzq2+unqvhgURYwl2YVkGdt3ZpT2+LDvRZFDAbAZD0EwTgmNcd6iUm aIi7ArooPOH1aQ4aAc72hVdmhzl5XvrAy9EjnJcUKZFraTjn5h7BSxcpfnUD+09FRVfu PB5Z55f1PKuzc7OTQCGxsN5cyz5ifgurLc/zSgJ1dOZzTP1R0VzLGOUDoVbrbzqkRup/ bnErHmrmZzYoyrcwY2jExDXOlGmBa/rTS9Ylc+8JguMDNtpHUS2fM3MxiHMx9zhZtCdz VwAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EI4mRStdafkoNtJ8fY+DRagx7mcRq+IkX+paBlxBeRo=; b=cHFehPoLkOUOD9qu20gTuaiNz8cNhEROVBZYjKRNEjpWTxMpPpjcGexQpWI5gR5DNP TwY+k2iq8bDWYqKehEXsxz871qARJC+SKwSK79Oje9WVQdXY8Bcxx/gm4D+GG0ghUh0f oqxAj/547a+EEsStDQHFjTU1yRJhdWYl8cpK2UDi2tysmQtRCxiztJRYqEQ5qlupMq3W 7Pz4uRnP8nisc6hpSQLl+P6/rYOjQjb8gHI9aajgOXbXvYtXqnYfNAm5wcl1gqAwlYgs 0kBZVix4ue76TvCmxgir6eBhUxzeRNW9WDi5DVeMaSQWi0Zhe+37bkrIo1ONRCbcLbGF XlHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FF9yb1DpXerrEwv/RYIcXG7ljy5V6ZsAwa4vhVhPRkwSJsAVA Ix85MpjZUxPCV9rGl4pieEX3YuaJKKKhLin6olCrm0ABvrQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7RNFGM/JXWiJ37uJzkXTMj3BC9bH6MFMzB/JXBdidzRPJ+4zgbxy/q+c/YtqxTSxu1dla+LcSDsHM5hLD5ko=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0fa:: with SMTP id h26mr3433886ljl.148.1592385401505; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159005445899.23374.13670236118157078353@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159005445899.23374.13670236118157078353@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:16:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CACj=BEgAPeeOPTZUUBp43C_4CuSEmnSjSC6T3wGZby55ECbuow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033d2c805a8441e20"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::229; envelope-from=yoav@yoav.ws; helo=mail-lj1-x229.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1jlUBh-0003DC-Io a8b1e706c3d5a32baf39c92dff920414
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CACj=BEgAPeeOPTZUUBp43C_4CuSEmnSjSC6T3wGZby55ECbuow@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37782
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Thanks for reviewing! Apologies for the late reply... :/

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:47 AM Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I have no significant concern here, but I would appreciate an answer if I
> understand the situation correctly.
>
> The Accept-CH header value is  structure header value and uses sh-token
> which
> has a more restrictive syntax than the HTTP specifications token used for
> header field names. However, this restriction is not of any real practical
> concern as all registered HTTP headers starts with an ALPHA. I did notice
> that
> the new HTTP semantics documents proposed new registry was not mandating
> but
> strongly recommending to keep within what sh-token can except. Thus, do I
> assume correctly that this issue has been sufficiently discussed in the WG?
>

I'm not sure I properly understand the issue you're referring to. Would you
like to see a stronger restriction than sh-token?