IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies

Ilya Grigorik <ilya@igvita.com> Mon, 04 February 2013 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F1521F881A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:59:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o05jb7SKfv2K for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4462721F8806 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U2Gvr-0006ef-Ev for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:57:39 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:57:39 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U2Gvr-0006ef-Ev@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ilya@igvita.com>) id 1U2Gvl-0006dw-Am for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:57:33 +0000
Received: from mail-qe0-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ilya@igvita.com>) id 1U2Gvk-0006Bq-GU for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:57:33 +0000
Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 1so2727802qec.33 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:57:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=mTNTRLq1fM4I3VJDqRxxdMSM+BVutbGfQg+uwCcpuTA=; b=RcTCER+rppYaAJq4w91OUL7R8oOYNEBH9bKSnhfAoNE9ehTpR66auAPIsbrIbYvHgL UUYnivSdQ8loAfAz+nKb1EqYJdjUBN5H44IrEBEXk985tnTu4J8tEigunz2pVggTMMZf lpnIQ6Yr7ycyjUrIele7mXaXnbKXvj69jZYCNAAey2XNqgvdqM+nK46yH4ZbjJCzRiQJ 0ETAliT0WxU0rXTrmcgb/0x4BfERXoczJR626L51nOcR3kkheMKFyIW/WE3ncp6NaiQW a6Y10Ig5Fh57QkDB+iV58Nm3klVNHOIvCqwg8R3p8IMcyfZ1mCJjdzysAvugAhaYUoWs mxGA==
X-Received: by 10.224.209.193 with SMTP id gh1mr17877177qab.86.1359964626607; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z5sm10073928qer.8.2013.02.03.23.57.04 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:57:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id j34so2518849qco.23 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:57:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.222.145 with SMTP id ig17mr11672110qab.5.1359964623504; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:57:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.48.193 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:56:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC30277211199AE58@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <CAA4WUYjiBZpShKKFfHQnixc94aOLrck0oR4ykARB=hF5h8nkfA@mail.gmail.com> <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC30277211199AE58@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com>
From: Ilya Grigorik <ilya@igvita.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:56:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKRe7JGD_zjhtUfv2RWBLk=mvbN6W-czom7mQg_xgp9qgHr_LQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
Cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3074b4124a845104d4e17089"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkRDk3OLjRiQtw1s+tHZr74PK5hWj8W9Vdk6J8h5LF653XjonSGxaN+Mje/Kdn/U+SvgvsH
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.128.46; envelope-from=ilya@igvita.com; helo=mail-qe0-f46.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.540, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U2Gvk-0006Bq-GU ea14b3d39e16f2b91e7bb1a195e1a5a6
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKRe7JGD_zjhtUfv2RWBLk=mvbN6W-czom7mQg_xgp9qgHr_LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16349
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> wrote:

> Where is the SPDY/4 prioritization proposal described?


Original thread from spdy-dev:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spdy-dev/-d9Auoun4HU/Pu73zcGv8eMJ

Also, original doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pNj2op5Y4r1AdnsG8bapS79b11iWDCStjCNHo3AWD0g/edit

One heads up though.. I believe the doc is out of date, and needs to be
updated. (in progress, I believe...)

ig

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email