Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Fri, 10 May 2013 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FF821F8D7A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3SUxPFPJzU4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965C921F85C0 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UatQS-0007Ld-5M for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 19:56:20 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:56:20 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UatQS-0007Ld-5M@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1UatQH-0007Jw-IU for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 19:56:09 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1UatQD-0004bu-L4 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 19:56:09 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id fb19so3433355obc.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o9nqHAXGeeIP9pr8i7G1QcLOs+RpsVVIvoCj3JqJx1A=; b=vEmkPm/AInmapzrmEWNT9XRM5kAN8YejwDttxMRueIZVuOl6DNBpzi9wEAQpeY2aQw dTiVk5dbESeLx4ipsIbTYWC/SbW1NdBFKdhU0y58cdQ74Hwd1sg7Pk4m6HiiMT8f7Itf bUzl3U8MIl5KCKeiMCj35zG+fQA87QOrGt7hwY0CpaW/2LPFIC52cJeRAZt1MDKo4IR1 BniJuuJKoUD6pIbhAECLU4H/UoUPPq29MTuq/lvDFQZ2YwnVxbG0nyOrcaaf+mr3mCh4 1lSFSn4XPUr8U6x9e/uayY61r+bGJ00EBVq3YCP7APlo/Gsivy0NXhMY36mNcaz5zjGg 5zgg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.155.209 with SMTP id vy17mr7846291oeb.83.1368209516002; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.130.139 with HTTP; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFA1p16FHaSf7b1=mhe_Cb=ZqV1m0HVwkQNdW+pkJ0OkA9L-5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbcfTjN5QFFuGm-P-rQMpAR3FGSC58WCy3qKn+29YCjn+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYiwNSzvrY1LF_Sex_82TSDwMbTvYqo7LyKfBAOu0j4pfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbdqnH0JK-UaMiaR5rLvZo8txywEcXXSUXa_y95hrLC5yA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7Rbd-VfTFYurZ-JEKjHKOeKvZCKoYLGMXf+0mi-_wbdKYqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgfu=rcji-bdxNPsE9KCE4T67+vN9b0iojnvycx5R-StA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX=AemYGrBzWGX1VEUgKKrk+hR6YV0jg9qVMSdPiimBAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFA1p16FHaSf7b1=mhe_Cb=ZqV1m0HVwkQNdW+pkJ0OkA9L-5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 11:11:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdifoF3aqQLB-EZjYqL3O2_uNEmNJ_+zAktu9zapKmT7w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd74c3a2e0e5e04dc611a47
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.172; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f172.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.688, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UatQD-0004bu-L4 922dbcc069bd9f2e7bc92b617dc9bc48
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNdifoF3aqQLB-EZjYqL3O2_uNEmNJ_+zAktu9zapKmT7w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17933
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The continuation bit is necessary for headers at a minimum, as we do have
headers which are > 65k, and something indicating either
end-of-semantic-header-block is necessary to support that.


I don't understand why it makes sense to limit header frames by the window
size.
what if the window size is zero?
What if it is 1 byte.

I don't see any real benefits for limiting control frames to anything
having to do with the window size as compared to sending a SETTING and
having the default before there and having it completely decoupled from
window size, and I do see a number of complications and ewws :/
-=R


On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com> wrote:

> While I love the idea of limiting frames to 65535B, I hate the idea of a
> continuation bit.
>
>     -Hasan
>
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
>
>> On 10 May 2013 10:40, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > [...] are we going to move forward with the frame
>> > continuation bit?
>>
>> I think that this was implicit in our decision to limit frames to
>> 65535 bytes (or less).
>>
>
>