Re: Authentication over HTTP

"Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net> Mon, 15 July 2013 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D5721F9E88 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRR59rQSSEpu for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F6221F9FE2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Uyie3-0002eX-Q0 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:16:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:16:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Uyie3-0002eX-Q0@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>) id 1Uyidu-0002do-4o for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:16:42 +0000
Received: from smtpout4.laposte.net ([193.253.67.229] helo=smtpout.laposte.net) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>) id 1Uyids-0007i0-Ui for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:16:42 +0000
Received: from arekh.dyndns.org ([88.174.226.208]) by mwinf8508-out with ME id 0dGD1m0034WQcrc03dGDZH; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:16:13 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arekh.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5D02E12C6; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:16:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at arekh.dyndns.org
Received: from arekh.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arekh.okg [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GsZAJXcGY6NA; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:16:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from arekh.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arekh.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:16:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 163.116.6.11 (SquirrelMail authenticated user nim) by arekh.dyndns.org with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:16:10 +0200
Message-ID: <68001f1050f7dceb6db7c0057ccad05f.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <19433.1373846559@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <51E330F5.6050100@gmail.com> <19433.1373846559@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:16:10 +0200
From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: M Stefan <mstefanro@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-10.fc19
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.253.67.229; envelope-from=nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net; helo=smtpout.laposte.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.112, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.391, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Uyids-0007i0-Ui 8b1bd4fa6b72c7d91e39bfead7bfb253
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Authentication over HTTP
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/68001f1050f7dceb6db7c0057ccad05f.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18786
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Le Lun 15 juillet 2013 02:02, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit :

> Authentication should happen either in the encrypting transport
> which moves HTTP/2.0 across (as in certificates and assymetric crypto)
> or in the application transported inside HTTP/2.0 (as in most web-site
> login dialogs), but HTTP/2.0 itself should not get involved:  It
> is the wrong layer.

However, secret transport *is* HTTP/2.0 domain, and there are quite a lot
of parts of the spec that assume "simple" auth (intermediary auth comes to
mind). I'm quite sure straightening auth requires at least some protocol
adjustments.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot