Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sun, 21 April 2013 11:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE4E21F8F0F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 04:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmmAm2mDdYoV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 04:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEECC21F8E04 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 04:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UTsOp-0006uI-SL for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:25:39 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:25:39 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UTsOp-0006uI-SL@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UTsOm-0006t3-T3 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:25:36 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UTsOl-0007K8-Ty for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:25:36 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.190.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD8D7509B6; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 07:25:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5173516A.8000807@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 21:25:10 +1000
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A96D4FE8-EF37-4224-9B38-8DD1CD2DA0F4@mnot.net>
References: <5C8F5647-EC0C-4EE2-81AF-8B1F340E3D24@mnot.net> <5173516A.8000807@treenet.co.nz>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.432, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UTsOl-0007K8-Ty 9130382daabaf676bafce5cf6b22997f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/A96D4FE8-EF37-4224-9B38-8DD1CD2DA0F4@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17448
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 21/04/2013, at 12:39 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: >> * 3.1.2.1 "Frequently, the representation is stored in coded form, transmitted directly, and only decoded by the recipient." Saying "final recipient" would be clearer. > > But incorect. Encoded from responses are routinely decoded by intermediary proxies for processing (think AV scanners on gzipped objects). They fall under "recipient", but not "final recipient". This isn't normative, and the sentence starts with "frequently"; without "final", the "only" is quite odd... -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- p2: Purely editorial feedback Mark Nottingham
- Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback Willy Tarreau
- Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback Mark Nottingham
- Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback Mark Nottingham
- Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback Amos Jeffries
- Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback Mark Nottingham
- Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback Mark Nottingham
- Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback James Cloos