Re: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices

Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com> Wed, 15 October 2014 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A20D1A026C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.112
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EdR9FghFd1h for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F5191A026A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XeGso-0003gg-Pp for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:12:22 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:12:22 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XeGso-0003gg-Pp@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>) id 1XeGsf-0003fs-BP for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:12:13 +0000
Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>) id 1XeGse-0000YH-Og for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:12:13 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x69so412367oia.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oJZGbcahiA+2D7bhHswmOgkP6lEosqPQaG+sub42+wg=; b=sillKYg9NJctUmnzWoLezAOeNAO3HfIMHXVNjyg9u+6TXGY0x9TlC8ZWQfZ3N4VIOm O70GU7SvgXNwjOyMbVhdkaumig7kFpakgIikNNuuh/RS+6rIDhvLf8t+rf3iPVF56iyC j1lvrTrmwRLuDOxPnZZmj0ryQWWvUUHMQ+qwuivR1oeRaFTAHNheWcq6TnoyKjA0d7BK 6/SA3frfRXZKOOdlFIq49oIYsVs6SsAn090z7+VTFA4Mbu+yQQ9ZT8ypB+/523sAhghP sKPjOX6+m1Tw9T7eU/wAsyLzS2ivdzb7+65AE3yn/axjANVQd+YGCIDBz/0+q6+1QP5D +LLA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.65.36 with SMTP id u4mr8664867obs.29.1413349906721; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.17.132 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NHhDTDtM4+DvWAf66GiO7of4H+ouMhxzseGODhfCSchXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+pLO_jkN67HLT7oup+FcYVY+RZ7ckhpY2gGy=TAsr2UUMnVVA@mail.gmail.com> <987FB86A-EF8B-4CD1-A9A7-52A9163E8CB3@mnot.net> <EBB30C88-7EBD-400F-9591-B646B4D3687B@mnot.net> <CAP+FsNeJU6aciA+UV3sQ318e4=fXxv9zZbsDZ1jXmYstz6XwaQ@mail.gmail.com> <E465C1C7-20DF-4F78-9936-9C914042920A@mnot.net> <20141013012326.GD13217@1wt.eu> <CAP+FsNci+YbQ9fP9LiJ1BBUSDryWOqi4A4YsKyORskY7pK0Fmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHzwyDuAeMJe_BW0kZkLUHRn6xAN8LO_uno_ZL0TmCLgSaYbkg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NHhDTDtM4+DvWAf66GiO7of4H+ouMhxzseGODhfCSchXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:11:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHzwyDuuN=-DyGiWAfttwq7O_zUGOE=7kVf5J=qu6i_-A9ezfg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.44; envelope-from=adrian.f.cole@gmail.com; helo=mail-oi0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.607, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XeGse-0000YH-Og e00b8bb09d052fd6cebded5407e362f4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAHzwyDuuN=-DyGiWAfttwq7O_zUGOE=7kVf5J=qu6i_-A9ezfg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27608
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> If an argument can be made that 2 byte encodings are still too large for
> dynamic headers, then instead
> of flipping back let's investigate how the 1 byte slots can be shared
> between static and dynamic.
FWIW, I'm happy to implement an alternate approach, if one comes out.
Thanks, Greg.