Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 01 February 2017 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF469129407 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 00:30:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pkWFt5traUUM for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 00:30:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3225D1293FB for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 00:30:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cYqFu-0007iz-Kg for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:27:06 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:27:06 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cYqFu-0007iz-Kg@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cYqFp-0007i6-PA for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:27:01 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cYqFj-0005uM-FE for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:26:56 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A185B22E256 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 03:26:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7C05CDCB-EDB5-4BD5-BA9F-8556350D695B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Message-Id: <3F68DC4A-3AC8-4309-8119-15A82C5E1EFC@mnot.net>
References: <148593754312.24497.16311379877517350605.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:26:29 +1100
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.946, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cYqFj-0005uM-FE 6b594b58c25c524bb23852f98b94d84b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/3F68DC4A-3AC8-4309-8119-15A82C5E1EFC@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33406
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

FYI; fairly minor update. Would love to hear what people think about the various suggested paths forward.

Cheers,



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt
> Date: 1 February 2017 at 7:25:43 pm AEDT
> To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry
> Revision:	01
> Title:		Retrying HTTP Requests
> Document date:	2017-02-01
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		18
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   HTTP allows requests to be automatically retried under certain
>   circumstances.  This draft explores how this is implemented,
>   requirements for similar functionality from other parts of the stack,
>   and potential future improvements.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/