Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <> Sun, 07 June 2020 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960A83A08B8 for <>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 18:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.649
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xbftm7-3b75g for <>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 18:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B243A08B7 for <>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 18:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <>) id 1jhkXm-0001Gi-9r for; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 01:56:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 01:56:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <>
Received: from ([]) by with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <>) id 1jhkXk-0001Fx-0U for; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 01:56:12 +0000
Received: from ([]) by with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <>) id 1jhkXi-0000XX-CO for; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 01:56:11 +0000
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68963A08B6; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 18:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <>
To: "The IESG" <>
Cc:,,, Tommy Pauly <>,
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 18:55:44 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=;;
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: 1jhkXi-0000XX-CO f1c2a80098d962919a62232649e52673
Subject: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/37727
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thank you for addressing my discuss (and comment!) points, and explaining
in cases where they were non-issues.

I do wonder whether (In Sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2) it might be better to say
"might not be preserved" rather than "may not be preserved", though it
hopefully doesn't matter.