IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Headers for HTTP

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 29 January 2020 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A68D12001A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:43:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4AKVnedIE9f for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612AF1208A9 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iwt7Q-0002gx-8F for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:35:20 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:35:20 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iwt7Q-0002gx-8F@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <sayrer@gmail.com>) id 1iwt7O-0002gC-E1 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:35:18 +0000
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <sayrer@gmail.com>) id 1iwt7M-0006MB-PN for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:35:18 +0000
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id k24so1094202ioc.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:35:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cc7knMbWu7xeixjgraylT27Jhvh0q9S++oo0a7GayKo=; b=RirVIKmOA/R+RpPFa8swCLDKFf6rTtk/7S1yHllmJxLdpQG2Kd8EXpTu/NVllztqXS mWt61lypCaVw/VV2rblm8rji72Er26bJkVyTR08K7Jdoc40MBzoosOXgDZ9LMYLwFnRM C+fd8j9Pg7BkIC1ivcjwxazc/f8jBr0ODIaj79VfSDowrKUa1mTA2Eleo1ieIAsDWk1X 0RhcWJ0eyZCEDyqhYudj+QHZoyvx1AHDWkg+6aLMwDzNtxWEjJD0hcIFyZRmgrjctb4x 9Aw4rjHXwLWjbkCUXGaYQc5wyiVoS+GWZjw/9NVNm9UepturXgz7VbcfaY6xo71GymfZ loFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cc7knMbWu7xeixjgraylT27Jhvh0q9S++oo0a7GayKo=; b=ez1Xx0XFfLg8DKgR/UbfuXjX3FYLpGiVYe3Wz1QRIaJF+b2pnA1IyVFu70Ido1rGgP MDz75JV2mxKUr1HcWlsy3uVTyb2JKxxQPeK2vbmmEzzRqyZUeDj06Xtq03aywn5BEhIa sHsGsoGh80bGHIl3G+UIuqGXrpJaO14qtOLXwRnxD6dA3L60VfEqUuQhh01yEgxhIHAC aAhnfMeQ8Qf6sTjviM9wYma+z5Pw6gEBKLKtqKHvFC+E9SOv+dBYy3u3kZrUTH189/vq +V5rZkRUTNPkJkFtUh/UOu3lBsxfPXq7bFtjyU/DrvPE7m48wPCNOzqeblp335Prf5ZQ dxig==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXNEqa7kNbTvlc8g/HncQ9g62a5B6mgz96Twp88UbCUj9u9KBIL B3/CllVcAbKHNKzJ7Lbn3Mm0lz/TA6bNyiE60K2l0nJOnMY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0kYDY34wInyQH+qnQoQymcr4GrwVJQZvFVJUUXYqqMiDOwJk5pOBTBD0oZxQrditNuM3jCxaeVOXzXfyFe/s=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:21a:: with SMTP id e26mr609553jaq.53.1580326515692; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:35:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C295C393-9602-4D41-9071-30629605E349@apple.com> <CAChr6Sxvf8b+qviZoBbhD4CjFohswmGBx+AzXUvggck80-zeRg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sxvf8b+qviZoBbhD4CjFohswmGBx+AzXUvggck80-zeRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:35:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwapcQV9Uj+aOE30b8nWSGQR4syX6QwjMwj0GPHXq1Q4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000099cb4a059d4c7069"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d; envelope-from=sayrer@gmail.com; helo=mail-io1-xd2d.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1iwt7M-0006MB-PN 2d2af54cfc6bdbf8d4211dc2869a77d0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Headers for HTTP
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAChr6SwapcQV9Uj+aOE30b8nWSGQR4syX6QwjMwj0GPHXq1Q4w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37319
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:29 AM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:14 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Structured Headers draft was updated yesterday, and Mark (as author)
>> let me know that the authors believe this is ready for last call. The
>> issues list is down to zero, so it's a good time for the working group to
>> take a careful read-through the document, and get it progressed!
>>
>
> I think the technical aim of the document is fine, but it needs another
> round just looking for editorial nits. I found small things like:
>
> Duplicate parsing steps (#2 and #6):
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-15#section-4.2
>

Ah, I see this is intentional, since the other sections say "input_string
is modified to remove the parsed value."

I am not sure this is a good way to specify this behavior, but it is
consistent and does not rise to level of an objection.

thanks,
Rob

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status