Re: #44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 17 March 2015 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540CF1A8772 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4S8GwIjwtIHZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DFB81A8737 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YXuZX-0004Qi-Rn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:42:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:42:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YXuZX-0004Qi-Rn@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1YXuZM-0004Pr-Gy for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:42:16 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1YXuZL-0007my-PL for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:42:16 +0000
Received: by obbgg8 with SMTP id gg8so11810331obb.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8yusEC9Wtd3W6+gyNfIQjTmwm3hCTvO9dmQ08YhjGB0=; b=FO6UXJPXVcGs4riojnFaY+fTxLOZPJlKlLASMN9Ax0NBouGFxdd5CPquALeMwW67Yv 9hFq5KwYeq7N4tc8iCtVKJzBNuKqJsVn+pOj7TiR7whPx0QT5mkqO3cwCBA4znzuMAkv ogKg96NwM5Hmihu9WZezs8cOoQwg41DIPEcsHGYZo/3AsmxIqEjvP9NSMZYn9XM8FxVq 9KSkvV0KFoeF5bHW2VldnbDByF8bj63b2zZYEGIfBvMlzpe6oLLcKqQZM+8/rMOymvtR z2gHxY0gqNdGunxpehM+XQ+THQaLxEORLNKDIYGLp+6uuXnjTqWKapILh4sXKLFqyEOU mI+w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.97.41 with SMTP id dx9mr54133281obb.4.1426610509892; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.48.151 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2A565EA2-D713-478F-A771-C08202657EC2@mnot.net>
References: <2A565EA2-D713-478F-A771-C08202657EC2@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:41:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVQPQqpZR85a1k=zX4kt6yETzxKqqk8nJbcc0K8mo9w7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.174; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f174.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.849, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-2, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YXuZL-0007my-PL c4af8c025240593eebbd009af329f12b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVQPQqpZR85a1k=zX4kt6yETzxKqqk8nJbcc0K8mo9w7A@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28984
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 16 March 2015 at 22:50, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Any objection to stating that they MUST be ignored by recipients?

Is there any reason that server-initiated streams need to be made
special?  I mean, once the standard response handling has started, I
can't imagine any reason for treating push specially.