Fwd: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 22 September 2014 21:55 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4B01A1B15 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.687
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74cjh-AGTdLZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB8A1A1B14 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XWBWB-00015f-95 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XWBWB-00015f-95@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1XWBVp-00014n-5K for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:13 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1XWBVo-0007Q3-4h for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:13 +0000
Received: from [10.1.3.135] (unknown [216.9.108.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49C4750A85 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:50:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_65FA8104-1786-4B46-8566-AEB0B184ECFE"
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:50:48 -0700
References: <8A2A44BA-D6DC-4588-A456-0796208F4BBD@gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FEB91DAA-7736-4468-A736-097295D06115@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XWBVo-0007Q3-4h efcf025f5e282d93b8854fa9e9267ad0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/FEB91DAA-7736-4468-A736-097295D06115@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27154
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
FYI; please have a look over this with an HTTP eye (and note that the intended status is Experimental). <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04> Cheers, Begin forwarded message: > From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> > Subject: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04 > Date: 21 September 2014 10:48:58 pm PDT > To: IETF HTTP Auth <http-auth@ietf.org> > Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/3B6SxPqTEQ6KadDvXMDmqQhZEiQ > > Hi all > > Stephen, Paul, and Michael submitted version -04 about a month ago, and it has received no discussion so far. The authors are of the opinion that the document is ready for publication, and it’s time for the group to weigh in on this subject. > > This mail begins working group last call for this document. Please take the time to read the draft and send comments to the list about its security, applicability, usefulness, and any other aspect you wish to discuss. For guidance on what to look for, let me quote the following from our charter: > The httpauth WG will be a short-lived working group that will document > a small number of HTTP user authentication schemes that might offer > security benefits, and that could, following experimentation, be > widely adopted as standards-track schemes for HTTP user > authentication. Each of these RFCs will be Informational or > Experimental, and should include a description of when use of its > mechanism is appropriate, via a use-case or other distinguishing > characteristics. > The WGLC is two weeks long, and ends on October 6th. Please send your reviews as replies to this message. > > Thanks, > > Yoav & Matt > _______________________________________________ > http-auth mailing list > http-auth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Fwd: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth-hob… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Fwd: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth… Amos Jeffries