Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4B01A1B15 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:55:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.687 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74cjh-AGTdLZ for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:54:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB8A1A1B14 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XWBWB-00015f-95 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:35 +0000 Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:35 +0000 Resent-Message-Id: Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XWBVp-00014n-5K for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:13 +0000 Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XWBVo-0007Q3-4h for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:13 +0000 Received: from [10.1.3.135] (unknown [216.9.108.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49C4750A85 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:50:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Nottingham Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_65FA8104-1786-4B46-8566-AEB0B184ECFE" Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:50:48 -0700 References: <8A2A44BA-D6DC-4588-A456-0796208F4BBD@gmail.com> To: HTTP Working Group Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XWBVo-0007Q3-4h efcf025f5e282d93b8854fa9e9267ad0 X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Fwd: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04 Archived-At: Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/27154 X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org Precedence: list List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: --Apple-Mail=_65FA8104-1786-4B46-8566-AEB0B184ECFE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 FYI; please have a look over this with an HTTP eye (and note that the = intended status is Experimental). Cheers, Begin forwarded message: > From: Yoav Nir > Subject: [http-auth] WGLC for draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04 > Date: 21 September 2014 10:48:58 pm PDT > To: IETF HTTP Auth > Archived-At: = http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/3B6SxPqTEQ6KadDvXMDmqQhZEiQ= >=20 > Hi all >=20 > Stephen, Paul, and Michael submitted version -04 about a month ago, = and it has received no discussion so far. The authors are of the = opinion that the document is ready for publication, and it=92s time for = the group to weigh in on this subject. >=20 > This mail begins working group last call for this document. Please = take the time to read the draft and send comments to the list about its = security, applicability, usefulness, and any other aspect you wish to = discuss. For guidance on what to look for, let me quote the following = from our charter: > The httpauth WG will be a short-lived working group that will = document > a small number of HTTP user authentication schemes that might offer > security benefits, and that could, following experimentation, be > widely adopted as standards-track schemes for HTTP user > authentication. Each of these RFCs will be Informational or > Experimental, and should include a description of when use of its > mechanism is appropriate, via a use-case or other distinguishing > characteristics.=20 > The WGLC is two weeks long, and ends on October 6th. Please send your = reviews as replies to this message. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Yoav & Matt > _______________________________________________ > http-auth mailing list > http-auth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ --Apple-Mail=_65FA8104-1786-4B46-8566-AEB0B184ECFE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 FYI; = please have a look over this with an HTTP eye (and note that the = intended status is Experimental).


Cheers,


Begin forwarded = message:

From: = Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
=
Subject: [http-auth] WGLC for = draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-04
Date: = 21 September 2014 = 10:48:58 pm PDT
To: = IETF HTTP Auth = <http-auth@ietf.org>

Hi all

Stephen, Paul, and Michael = submitted version -04 about a month ago, and it has received no = discussion so far.  The authors are of the opinion that the = document is ready for publication, and it=92s time for the group to = weigh in on this subject.

This mail begins = working group last call for this document. Please take the time to read = the draft and send comments to the list about its security, = applicability, usefulness, and any other aspect you wish to discuss. For = guidance on what to look for, let me quote the following from our = charter:
  The httpauth WG will be a =
short-lived working group that will document
  a small number of HTTP user authentication schemes that might offer
  security benefits, and that could, following experimentation, be
  widely adopted as standards-track schemes for HTTP user
  authentication. Each of these RFCs will be Informational or
  Experimental, and should include a description of when use of its
  mechanism is appropriate, via a use-case or other distinguishing
  characteristics.
The WGLC is two weeks long, and ends on = October 6th. Please send your reviews as replies to this = message.

Thanks,

Y= oav & = Matt
_______________________________________________
http-au= th mailing list
http-auth@ietf.org
https://www.i= etf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/



= --Apple-Mail=_65FA8104-1786-4B46-8566-AEB0B184ECFE--