Re: If not JSON, what then ?

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 03 August 2016 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1140A12DB82 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 06:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqrN3XEuPSfH for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 06:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476AF12DB81 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 06:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bUvyF-0005qq-HP for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:12:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:12:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bUvyF-0005qq-HP@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1bUvyA-0005pO-UO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:12:22 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1bUvy7-0007bE-Au for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:12:21 +0000
Received: from [192.168.98.220] (unknown [62.154.197.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A6D150A88; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:09:40 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <75814.1470229640@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:09:39 +0200
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7A018F8-A07A-4142-814F-61BB42B553CE@mnot.net>
References: <12ED69B4-C924-475E-9432-B8FEB4B9DF80@mnot.net> <20160803063730.EDABAF792@welho-filter3.welho.com> <20160803064633.GB500@1wt.eu> <201608030937.u739bpxx007542@shell.siilo.fmi.fi> <20160803094554.GE500@1wt.eu> <CABkgnnWqHTinXDNXxM7Lw9SBGCCPb-j6BgKF=wjWKXRUbfe1oQ@mail.gmail.com> <75814.1470229640@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.540, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bUvy7-0007bE-Au c3e828f4028d00c77d6deda3836b89df
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: If not JSON, what then ?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/E7A018F8-A07A-4142-814F-61BB42B553CE@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32174
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 3 Aug 2016, at 3:07 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> 
>> I said this privately to someone at the workshop, but my realization
>> was that we currently have schema-aware parsing with extremely limited
>> points of extension.  A revised system that supports that doesn't need
>> to be very complex.  Even a single level map of string key to
>> (optional) string value is more extensibility than we can sensibly
>> defend.
> 
> As with HPACK/huffman, I don't see the need to heurstically restict
> the data model, I would rather precisely restrict its use for
> individual headers.

Keep in mind that we're not going to require new headers to use this thing; if their needs aren't met, they can do something else.

Looking at recently minted headers, I'm still sharing Martin's inclination to keep it simple and flat.


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/