Ciphersuite requirements ext#26
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 19 August 2014 18:26 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A171A06BF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PqLGPiwSfJ4N for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B221A06A5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XJo4W-0003TM-Cx for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:23:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:23:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XJo4W-0003TM-Cx@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XJo4D-0003SH-9G for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:23:33 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XJo4C-0004ow-J9 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:23:33 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ho1so5734639wib.16 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1UNdonjixeAaoXzvwKk3KXOQ+qhvRjmJupSPGQ+ZrW4=; b=G+pFdcWjCWlVGquegak4c18aQzTZX8Lt3mpA0Z2TQMtppSwq5VCqlAqlyknh7r2vD/ ZC/9UUXPrjAstEhWCsaBRqoI8iFF48tvajv5+q+iG5Y88hBk4TTB/OXZVqczDhx6RB9I FbP2jAmm79eLuMvYEH+Dk0Qsi78gpvA9qFGVgwfAV6sP4gHYL3eXUBtFOHTofoi5JaYT bkoJvs0y0STZKbkLTfCw1r/sOEOIZEnmXuVi9Ly37GBA4hOdagizSv5dPSgnZSLG2grq Rc447sGw/guu2BBsjaYK19AW1DzBi+wv2mt3yPnOawlQzLQslYw1igZ7GEmIkMNGFCtr Hkhw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.205.70 with SMTP id le6mr51466160wjc.25.1408472586187; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.6.229 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:23:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVXt0EoHW5TSJmYy+Y5qQt5ocuBQ+eMzPdaraD5rZDHng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.177; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f177.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.734, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XJo4C-0004ow-J9 44bde5925aaae8b868a26f920e8e6169
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Ciphersuite requirements ext#26
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVXt0EoHW5TSJmYy+Y5qQt5ocuBQ+eMzPdaraD5rZDHng@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26660
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>From the issue (https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/26) Section 3 implies that there are no cipher suite requirements on Opp Sec, but it'd be good to discuss and formalise this. May require tweaks to HTTP/2 (which places requirements on use of TLS, not TLS with "https"). -- PHK will disagree, but I think that we're OK here. Better to have a single robust profile than to permit exceptions. There are several problems with exceptions or variations: * oppsec will be detectable as such to a passive observer * a single configurations is more robust; better to use a single code path and far better not to risk weakening "https" accidentally
- Ciphersuite requirements ext#26 Martin Thomson
- Re: Ciphersuite requirements ext#26 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Ciphersuite requirements ext#26 Martin Thomson