Re: adding Header Continuation

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Mon, 20 May 2013 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6F521F92FC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.582, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PUwWk2qHc-vX for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D305C21F92E8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UeSuf-0007zt-9B for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:26:17 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:26:17 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UeSuf-0007zt-9B@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UeSuU-0007z4-Ek for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:26:06 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UeSuT-0007zQ-Bj for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:26:06 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wd20so5550514obb.38 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=tqPwYnWRs54oXD1g6ePStDtXe+jG8H+A06kPvWAoaj0=; b=b1y9P6Bh2RwDLNlwuAoQe5sdNRisZ4z7CHg9FiU8JTCvwsG19nF24nD8CM9JRjizgm ylR75bbEGZNaf1zN1RiiuC5tFqMrhvl77bLjlXifA8qbZHEL+FtMSuGwOG7N5qMfeWEb W/giNicvoImIJw/arUe59B5QNEa8R2SsFRLZP5iZy/PUVznYaRXV7Vvq9fg/PiN4JFjN R8k92RlCGVO91vSIxrUbUQfPa3ba3cxvYRtagNJUruLYNyLALG0Cj8nTET46GlM2kmaS ekaZgWAYOActUFXB2eAlif7baCYFkyYBMM1BmITVkBzwKjSmpHkrU2/QakRaDlk94v9e zJLg==
X-Received: by 10.182.129.4 with SMTP id ns4mr17465091obb.22.1369067136206; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F052EE82-6AD0-4A4B-924E-7A01D71A4037@mnot.net>
References: <F052EE82-6AD0-4A4B-924E-7A01D71A4037@mnot.net>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:25:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbdVdrOrAuZR+t0Or5CXqGmy-gtfAhaNmfvE=Sc8hOFavg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.179; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f179.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.703, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UeSuT-0007zQ-Bj d6615a59250432db6847477324cd15a9
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: adding Header Continuation
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbdVdrOrAuZR+t0Or5CXqGmy-gtfAhaNmfvE=Sc8hOFavg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18038
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I am ok with putting this in for now so long as the possible security
risk is acknowledged. In general, however, I believe the risk is quite
low.

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Roberto submitted a pull request for header continuation:
>   https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/98
>
> Without going into the fine details of the text, are we ready to have such a thing?
>
> My reading is that people are OK with this, at least to the point of putting it in the implementation draft (i.e., implementation experience may cause us to pull it back out again).
>
> Speak up if you disagree.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>