Re: Updated I-D..

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Sat, 20 April 2013 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1964121F8E6C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOHs+hMRIqoo for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C63921F8E48 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UTdJk-0003lx-77 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:19:24 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:19:24 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UTdJk-0003lx-77@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UTdJh-0003lH-23 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:19:21 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UTdJf-0001Bu-U1 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:19:21 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id wp18so1164447obc.34 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=yYLiFa2KOMroLr7CW6LH2G/MFTVRkTI8oReMlNEBMA8=; b=cJSR8ueg7cOC6dZwJ9CNvKuwHtH6ALrERS+MZPjN9P7JxTmEGegHEq1AjQKh1ZN0gM K1R1GX4yd/YnaNgBdpT3MLDFUUZOZUJUGbuxl3QHupjf1BwWoFem23TyjZ44o8elTADM m4dcizVgA46XW4gFlOsEYUBYhuY9yyi/JB5Ds6fKWD46kcHdcwR+89BO8gyFVn3EIuij lp2N4tdnldekAo+FBMDWsnmaf1B8ZnpjV4d1REM9LsKoyJnq+fG41KeN3R8W4FAZj5K3 pde4cGIc4reSdSBjTAvuEdZvIfy7T3j4vtofN9WPGYV+PUZtE8r0qApAHbuxST79r8Cv Rw8w==
X-Received: by 10.182.246.198 with SMTP id xy6mr6369563obc.1.1366485533840; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbdZxkHgGLek=roY2rm3_cHu_2JO-1xPS-915HqmOwmbDg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbdZxkHgGLek=roY2rm3_cHu_2JO-1xPS-915HqmOwmbDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:18:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbeUfotfenxw9ZSfzsAOnX_g9UygcBgc0ShnD+0ACk=Zqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.175; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f175.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.696, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UTdJf-0001Bu-U1 620c96c37854bbfc1285572a01c7f626
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Updated I-D..
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbeUfotfenxw9ZSfzsAOnX_g9UygcBgc0ShnD+0ACk=Zqg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17429
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Minor tweak: the definition of the "header-block" construction in
Section 3 was incorrect, and I noticed a copy-paste bug in the doc
short title. Fixed...

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-05.txt

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:57 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> All, I've posted an update to the bohe I-D that describes the current
> state of the header encoding options I'm exploring.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-04.txt
>
> This is essentially what I described last week with a few tweaks here
> and there. It combines what I feel are the best elements from the
> Delta and HeaderDiff options and rolls in the typed value codecs. I
> have an implementation in github that can be tested with the
> compression-header test suite.
>
> https://github.com/jasnell/http2
>
> As always, comments are welcome.
>
> - James