Re: #469: definition of "private"
David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> Wed, 08 May 2013 00:02 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452D411E80D3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 17:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BYHGl01JP6Ao for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 17:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A1A11E80D5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 17:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UZroo-0008Gg-Ni for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 00:01:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 00:01:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UZroo-0008Gg-Ni@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <dwm@xpasc.com>) id 1UZroZ-0008FA-WB for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 00:01:00 +0000
Received: from c2w3p-2.abacamail.com ([209.133.53.32]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <dwm@xpasc.com>) id 1UZroZ-0006NG-8Z for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:59 +0000
Received: from xpasc.com (unknown [68.164.244.188]) by c2w3p-2.abacamail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423704055A; Wed, 8 May 2013 00:00:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from egate.xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by xpasc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4800T4b024078; Tue, 7 May 2013 17:00:29 -0700
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 17:00:29 -0700
From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW82HUnRPcchrLG3++SDmhoJ14mqGHRKSW5H2ZFm-jbDg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1305071658070.23838@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <3FC21BBE-DCDB-4332-9851-B19D1AF70EC1@mnot.net> <CABkgnnUFv386gf7R2k5rZ+bhS3D3tqh4jc65vC031vPuEODVWg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1305071153130.21219@egate.xpasc.com> <CABkgnnW82HUnRPcchrLG3++SDmhoJ14mqGHRKSW5H2ZFm-jbDg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Milter-Version: master.87-g7939dec
X-AV-Type: clean
X-AV-Accuracy: exact
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.133.53.32; envelope-from=dwm@xpasc.com; helo=c2w3p-2.abacamail.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.171, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UZroZ-0006NG-8Z 6c402541c608812b5a09cce40fc63b0a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #469: definition of "private"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.LRH.2.01.1305071658070.23838@egate.xpasc.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17882
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Tue, 7 May 2013, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 7 May 2013 11:54, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote: > > > > I prefer "single user" as "single user agent" would preclude a shared desk > > top proxy supporting multiple user agents as one example. Privacy is a > > user concern and should be expressed that way. > > I'd finagle that - the proxy is the user agent in that case. True, but that was the cleanest example of a private but shared cache. Various browsers have options for sharing cookies with / from other browsers. I don't see a reason to forbid Firefox from sharing a single end user cache with IE or Chrome or etc.
- Re: #469: definition of "private" Martin Thomson
- #469: definition of "private" Mark Nottingham
- Re: #469: definition of "private" David Morris
- Re: #469: definition of "private" Martin Thomson
- Re: #469: definition of "private" David Morris
- Re: #469: definition of "private" Mark Nottingham