Re: The document's address
Nicholas Shanks <nickshanks@gmail.com> Fri, 08 March 2013 16:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826D821F886D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:13:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pNRrgz8IQaFp for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADD621F886B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UDzu2-0000Uk-3D for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:12:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:12:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UDzu2-0000Uk-3D@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nickshanks@gmail.com>) id 1UDzto-0000RN-Iy for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:12:00 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nickshanks@gmail.com>) id 1UDztj-0002YR-NH for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:12:00 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id j14so1455060lbo.38 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:11:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=jS57Qm6VHApKqfBjQqTnIcyfsCzkVIXe94+7u16DM3E=; b=AF5Y5ElZL/IjqCRJ4SLJEmZ26C5IwSsEp3oZdPAd9FUWuiJaFTcs2weRt2eBOMd1l/ xKNC2qTZ7w/um3hWHNcDiYGqw/APFlx2oN+4+NfwnKw/jzGp3PVl+6ICT0dDKXWbbYO5 6cPK+BQdu471bCsZL4BNv2LixaGPoDIGSJoRFLIlhVyWqhUvnFVfHZjoYU/C4fwBjtfr 1alt6KHGGRfun1u+iObCbDFO8e1eXtKRi472jrBAqqf61KiV+hbDlHkgSDPaKPraNKKn Y+up8eayHYqmAh3cw6U7sryWu6uZ0c16PWpQXgyXS7rUflNd4ei5ftwVfHHHV3xxmb/L 1g/w==
X-Received: by 10.112.8.9 with SMTP id n9mr1248024lba.71.1362759088948; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:11:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.1.7 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:10:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <513A06D3.6030802@gmx.de>
References: <DF0A84C4-AEAB-4716-B23F-FB3BA48BDE3C@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1301171948100.2101@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <CA+hEJVXz61Z16v5scW=YnM_5f6MY==PBySor82hRFA+rbuDuZw@mail.gmail.com> <E1445F85-E1EA-4B2E-AE96-62361EFC025D@gbiv.com> <CA+hEJVWww72deBu9nWTxJax+XX8u7E=wez37hmZJtRR0jtPTVA@mail.gmail.com> <513A06D3.6030802@gmx.de>
From: Nicholas Shanks <nickshanks@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:10:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+hEJVU_=UFZZLv9zHfz0dVXaVkVX3RzKDbvBKHD03eOt5iXsg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: IETF HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.217.179; envelope-from=nickshanks@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f179.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.760, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UDztj-0002YR-NH 9a73a3a2d21444297413adc29ba7ea4b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: The document's address
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+hEJVU_=UFZZLv9zHfz0dVXaVkVX3RzKDbvBKHD03eOt5iXsg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16990
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 8 March 2013 15:42, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > That implies a concept of hierarchical ownership that simply does not exist > in HTTP. It might for some servers, but there's no guarantee. Can you provide an example (make one up) where ownership cannot be defined as hierarchical and accumulative? I am suggesting that HTTP's concept of "ownership" (for purposes of replacing cache entries) be defined by the specs to be hierarchical, since if I own / and I want to sabotage /subdir/ all I have to do is log in to the server and replace/delete it. -- Nicholas.
- Re: The document's address Nicholas Shanks
- Re: The document's address Roy T. Fielding
- Re: The document's address Nicholas Shanks
- Re: The document's address Julian Reschke
- Re: The document's address Nicholas Shanks
- Re: The document's address Julian Reschke
- Re: The document's address Albert Lunde
- Re: The document's address Eitan Adler
- Re: The document's address Martin Thomson