Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ACD1295C2 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:56:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.296 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.296 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=igvita-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qk8OrlrdTuI5 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:56:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD8F1295AA for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cE1C6-0004KM-9A for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:53:06 +0000 Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:53:06 +0000 Resent-Message-Id: Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cE1Bx-0004JG-8C for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:52:57 +0000 Received: from mail-qt0-f177.google.com ([209.85.216.177]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cE1Bn-00009W-Nv for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:52:51 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id n6so328894806qtd.1 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:52:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igvita-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+55ggNZrG2LTksGPPJSXcUfBPUMkmww5FtI1oudN2Do=; b=okZyO9R2nxrkOXctb5i0LYuOF3g9V+iXBnI/08WxOUV64Uhgrmh2qd39UN1oikS6hH Neq57X7G/vckeO+vECX3Jbu0MziHagUV6yJZ8z6PatNfqfOPUCgL7ri+0ZU+bR+jhf/K +jQVTSx+SNGYKQ6MDbRGRiUQRWXXlKxaPKNq9XG88peCvKUWzFAIPhVVCapNmMjFexMO XzaZC/xOOmiQlX1Tv4dVYrE64BxwSEB6zYDDnmF4duHVZ3swd4KnpBZ3y2sMbMfWRDZy g16rOUWok3dvvhCHChySJTGVXe15BUmWJMchW7Nx+sQxrEMU0KltoOhWz4X5y6byJisL j+ZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+55ggNZrG2LTksGPPJSXcUfBPUMkmww5FtI1oudN2Do=; b=m0bR19eRvPwCroZnslKsT8AgOeA76jX6uIPTYJL3ZU5Sgh+aNOve3iOMjVFx+3WFba V6Bp6+sgQOhf4Vuog08HUSYuaZK/J54cqiPy99SqTKoy8dsU/Mus8vDeiU5Z0qM8qRp9 EfBH4Npzy2u9QTsGJP1/JqlTQQmxGOhr/EBa9+BfvLBb2RJEUC2JyfDHzMD+h5zW/1yB t5sLFipwC2HtDyOyhEsenQZmOURW6m2dGALmTT/uzVCe3GplswHXfOEJwnjsEqgoeJq5 fIhVJZmC5KQjONMyNrGKEB4IzSbl9eU90LTzC19rExSMqqvGGBwuEZ6pqu6iebgC1Ett y6zQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC017w0LjfF0kIpkR4eA6ngZU33otSQo7WQhA2xfJU/b/I56dqj4XOJoap05ZuOkiYA== X-Received: by 10.200.40.27 with SMTP id 27mr52044646qtq.281.1480974740583; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:52:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qt0-f171.google.com (mail-qt0-f171.google.com. [209.85.216.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o190sm10476095qke.5.2016.12.05.13.52.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:52:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt0-f171.google.com with SMTP id p16so327598246qta.0 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:52:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.200.47.140 with SMTP id l12mr57780061qta.51.1480974739717; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:52:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.22.234 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:51:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <95173.1480926596@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <148070210225.29664.2630836091018103593.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <33226.1480703913@critter.freebsd.dk> <21010c5f-6a6c-1632-b3dd-d0cec7a9e336@gmx.de> <95134.1480926027@critter.freebsd.dk> <95173.1480926596@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Ilya Grigorik Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:51:39 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Julian Reschke , "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113572d848482a0542f04dc0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.177; envelope-from=ilya@igvita.com; helo=mail-qt0-f177.google.com X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.717, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1 X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cE1Bn-00009W-Nv ce650dca00af65bd8be5d188cac150e2 X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt Archived-At: Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/33119 X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org Precedence: list List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: --001a113572d848482a0542f04dc0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > In message , Julian Reschke > writes > : > > >>>>> Title : HTTP Client Hints > >>>>> [...] > >>>>> Save-Data = sd-token *( OWS ";" OWS [sd-token] ) > >>>>> sd-token = token > >>>> > >>>> Why isn't this list separated by "," like we usually do ? > >>> > >>> It's consistent with other client hints which do not use list syntax... > >>> That said, the prose should state like for the other hints... > >> > >> It may be consistent, but it is a good idea, if we want to make life > >> simpler down the road ? > > > >No opinion on that right now; just explaining how the draft likely got > >there. > > Ok. > > I'd like to suggest that we make these two (?) drafts conform to > common structure, by making the lists comma separated. > Background: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/168 We didn't intend Save-Data to be a list.. The goal was to allow attributes on the single token defined in CH. I'll defer to Mark on Key. --001a113572d848482a0542f04dc0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp &l= t;phk@phk.freebsd.d= k> wrote:
e90e3aa8-9e53-f077-f6ab-7c7fc50e0061@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke= writes
:

>>>>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Title=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: HTTP Client Hints
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Save-Data =3D sd-token *( OWS "= ;;" OWS [sd-token] )
>>>>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0sd-token =3D token
>>>>
>>>> Why isn't this list separated by "," like we= usually do ?
>>>
>>> It's consistent with other client hints which do not use l= ist syntax...
>>> That said, the prose should state like for the other hints...<= br> >>
>> It may be consistent, but it is a good idea, if we want to make li= fe
>> simpler down the road ?
>
>No opinion on that right now; just explaining how the draft likely got<= br> >there.

Ok.

I'd like to suggest that we make these two (?) drafts conform to
common structure, by making the lists comma separated.

Background:=C2=A0https://github.com/httpwg= /http-extensions/issues/168

<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">We didn't intend Save-Data to be a list.. The= goal was to allow attributes on the single token defined in CH. I'll d= efer to Mark on Key.
--001a113572d848482a0542f04dc0--