Re: http/2 initial limits - i see flow control initial limits specified, but not stream limits

William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Fri, 03 May 2013 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B3021F8FBE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id utz+yrdv-LSm for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC3E21F853D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UYKAI-000796-7k for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 17:53:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 17:53:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UYKAI-000796-7k@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1UYKA8-000732-0U for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 17:52:52 +0000
Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1UYKA7-0001D1-CK for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 17:52:51 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i13so484012qae.7 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 03 May 2013 10:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jYOo9WOd6mJdKj9/whgFzBtUjt3Das/CMcUnyG7ZmcA=; b=Rtm5/bLBn/JDAEI37HBM/YQ4cvrJ5q6fNEdF/bBLW68sbASKAZ1PREjC7X73YebmJh Ct3cabbEbLT6XV6v8zmiJJ9PU/PjUE6GVSQFGva4T9uukCHiOR/Fh1/0rCfypruhDSh7 7JQROajUga3b3RQl6AWvlsFQ5Yf0c1cOvVdtAWzR5EDo8NFNCO3DGhx0yOOdoc9T5lvz 79zVF3NMgv5qwq0RbIqwBAopCyZWcdgz6W4U17QbQX/bQVf+VHQfGxaTgGqkTK7AFxJV n8RA/V9vbiyxT9ERHg4Cr7tM7GKSvXrGRudZlXMbQEsbdXwMa7W5LDG7YYzo7ukFZjXd t7OA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jYOo9WOd6mJdKj9/whgFzBtUjt3Das/CMcUnyG7ZmcA=; b=faRcbFJP7G5gI8MnPQ8p0nz4ebebfK5hdkKx9wQc8jKWwIN4xky0weuI/qh++8bKnm M+eXQVoAOr2JY8YkCEe2iJ38KHXKY+56XyLYQgTsj5WtENVTiJjJ3BvH+iEGczJtmRUx W6doU88O08q0c8NUp/umNJBTfR5RszfFJGcQ4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=jYOo9WOd6mJdKj9/whgFzBtUjt3Das/CMcUnyG7ZmcA=; b=lZEIt+9OxD3XUWojdYqfY8XrNJzR7iXK6NYiyiD9VY7HqOPT5ROeqCfVw4eo+7MKuN hGB+RtoNklTvxdHXQzUi/ANbUn96IKTtnnqV1wWG37oQWHLB5E1MB4o2Msfe1CrVgJoT 72ZQCfxZBNgrBahbDaGBmI3L2AF5cqZnLbwBTxm7lZl3h0zeG/f5XBRf46otkyFqNAbs w2Sqq6bjCEwJpt53wvpH8P/Z/afUoF9KUL1Dt0uZ6GVXbZJlup/mDtygWkazt+f5pet/ a0nt7PkXpJ7kxT2e7d2wXcAWC2TR6spdK9XHwwfpLP+QuMrJhW1H0ikmCbiHA/PUPr78 2efg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.199.199 with SMTP id et7mr13911683qab.31.1367603545583; Fri, 03 May 2013 10:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.229.180.4 with HTTP; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbfxGehBXw+114wyaKJaTQV1rLqCiZXq6KERWbO_HRRpBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA4WUYjnMupHPL8i13qzNTYr4dDjc_-ygZABaM1C6c8zUuMGJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfxGehBXw+114wyaKJaTQV1rLqCiZXq6KERWbO_HRRpBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 14:52:25 -0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: sfolHlYd6WhDVHW0OY98X9bcTK0
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYg_zRcyU1Qju+MA_4YT3FJB4PVAWi+iVkqi=9uvAo84YA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb3e3873f5504dbd403d2
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYIeKT/KDFzRdGejZfPevb7uCeAZBDiY44xuWTlgVaBbQMqQkOixXQfQFP8Mk0EwGvoYaYMGIFNjJRcNLfisyyzv2rG+Mc0ZR93P1Ruq7tlzl2XhuTSeX7RXCOTXcqVVelGa6jeLACJbI6JbyzAip7VV0nw7jzhE0fCETlbc4AOjoKwB6BeV9cG//RTE9p8UcD0DDx
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.48; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-qa0-f48.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.434, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.581, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UYKA7-0001D1-CK 8168f891158baec70cb87bc8e3dbe954
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: http/2 initial limits - i see flow control initial limits specified, but not stream limits
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYg_zRcyU1Qju+MA_4YT3FJB4PVAWi+iVkqi=9uvAo84YA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17805
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The setting is there, but I don't see the initial limit, which I believe
was 100.


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:47 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Which limits specifically? SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS is still
> there. Are there others you're concerned about?
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, William Chan (陈智昌)
> <willchan@chromium.org>; wrote:
> > Did the stream limits disappear by accident?
>