Nice to have guidance (was: Re: Reprioritization - implementation intent)

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Tue, 21 July 2020 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FD43A0E03 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qJmRK898ypD2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 892A03A0E02 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jxws3-0006lF-OE for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jxws3-0006lF-OE@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1jxws1-0006k3-7V for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:05 +0000
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1jxwrz-0002jg-LG for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:05 +0000
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id y3so4761771wrl.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gD0ljhw2YF4UtSrz7CBdobaze5nA4YPdl0sBiOdpVww=; b=sqlyd3+2dcJmeJw4jHW1OVeH8BW5adb2F5GGU0inrnXPCggl7Nz8jT+IdnViwueF2g L9RYxW/jPRuO55NFmnpMMAmwnKZOf1JQeIKguyhZB7RzCfZ10oiHxwxuU78WtyVz95FK jv7+nrjlMxLp7VZP4zMmz4w/ndyinlVGgJ6IoNhHWNxph+hglD6yVlc8/kpye29SAi4i ZRDo7Mo1d9baTgLqJ8ZcJjanKtrewSzYfLuDlQRJVMMk7GYvyBXetyNTOT3Gq+8b1UXF 1dguwOSh8vBUQnhf7U0ZosXB2f3Ue7UBs5OUvMwRiTFH3PvboYih0mn1dcR7GQ69stdd tshQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gD0ljhw2YF4UtSrz7CBdobaze5nA4YPdl0sBiOdpVww=; b=Qz74BrVvn0BaOY4k/rsMVdXoY/MhpFjRJEFBjDe2/cNrOhRKJQPY1Y/+x5Xo4KRzs9 Z8Pmnicg+FFSQiU0A7BOZj9WebPWFYRbcituluiYR3bladMuTA2h0/H5BlIe6wrdEjwz FMm/nsDRi7MOEr35OX5Lxo8DxlMl2ZTJ3Dxyy2vkqOkhQ5wE73diBqsrueBWXMIvMTyf g5m/u+2SZg8fo3Rrh0nWgsOli57naXgKoUqN0cjDWjt0WdSsdXX+fCqY26PvDZM1Xaz7 Xi6WaRwkp5785IlCW3WDZzwTQ1g5QhkKAveBas3xm7Dgyj+2k3/GAop/ztxaPbBSdK6X O00A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KPNNxnAfDRKh+GeK6rPZ3aqPmI/zvA7i0VSTzOeNK3MVFzosN l4rLW1X9P2Ko1ErmB+A17I76yeen9BjvZO5iNjbYiqyr
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwy//6JiaxvDU75K8xziX3yehikGHO+/wRByle8JuKtr6m8gs6Gopd1UlEDu9P+FiSsuNMMzQMA8DwGo0CA8E8=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:480b:: with SMTP id l11mr6506044wrq.85.1595355592438; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9obRjBSADN1KtKF6jvFVzNS1+JzaS0D0kCVKHKkd4sn+MQ@mail.gmail.com> <459C86F8-A989-4EF4-84DC-3568FF594F36@apple.com> <CANatvzwSpSHd7kZD-4tyMGkBJDdCBi6r_pLBvnaT8rrQy6SBHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACMu3treK0m2mbpw9FebOjOcEed0bW-DbLbryHJH1DWAHoz+9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJV+MGy2CytgPVEwEO3nDfpZ6h9+CCL-bODk=65cXexvS3N7Lw@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oYDApddLFzXv180TEXpmTaOpDCDNY41PxmbMJK7N4F4zQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMWgRNaMZxph3zQv+O-SW7=PKBtDuGZNQ4+3X2geyXU545Vx9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMWgRNaBAodWewpbi4cqFiMLWVd0SDnau7B4x0tjk+i=sMURpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANatvzyQiNXY6xOYju8afe7-T6ZNMtQTPQE-AkfFK=2_yTzB1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CACj=BEhh+K=uMS613OsDFmvH18miNvm9m11M7QsL02Lc+JxUhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJV+MGx3-cvPER2q1SPsgTbVP0TwAgPzNCQk_40dDPSr3JfkNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJV+MGwXLoVe3RWPMCw9iJQ1Qr0TrJOezWq1VWOqrWYnBneQ4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9ob5E9ufzut7gZ37HwFvzeUb8mZYcyy=M3xKhS3hCCfyyw@mail.gmail.com> <4B9F6F51-4F0A-4A41-AA6D-2CB82A1B6531@mnot.net> <594BE12E-D3C4-454F-B7DB-FFF745DF536F@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <594BE12E-D3C4-454F-B7DB-FFF745DF536F@apple.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:19:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9obXPffL2QvFCMXZooFvZ5n7sWvvXLb_K_FBUA4zwaBY_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Kinnear <ekinnear@apple.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000060b7bb05aaf7ab0c"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::433; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x433.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1jxwrz-0002jg-LG 1b51272fcb5534244b834d4fd07dcb3c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Nice to have guidance (was: Re: Reprioritization - implementation intent)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9obXPffL2QvFCMXZooFvZ5n7sWvvXLb_K_FBUA4zwaBY_w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37902
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Eric,

Just responding to your side note

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 6:56 PM Eric Kinnear <ekinnear@apple.com> wrote:

>
> Side note:
>
> For the document as a whole, we’ve gotten some feedback internally that it
> would be really nice if there were some (minimal, recommendation only)
> guidance as to how to respond to the priority signals when received. This
> wouldn’t be restrictive, as we’re really excited to experiment here and see
> what awesome results we can achieve, but having a baseline of “implement
> this as written and you’ll do *okay” *might be worth considering to
> increase the likelihood that we have a large group of generally-performant
> implementations.
>
> An example here would be if two requests of the same urgency arrive
> back-to-back, the first with the incremental bit set and the second
> without. What gets sent when? What do you do next if a third request
> arrives with the incremental bit also set before the first is complete?
> There are lots and lots of permutations, but a general approach of handling
> new items coming in is something that I think we’ve all been imagining
> during discussions, but we haven’t really written it down explicitly.
> Internally, as we discussed with some folks new to the topic, we discovered
> that our imaginations of what to do in cases like these didn’t actually
> align as well as we thought.
>

Thanks for your feedback. I think this is orthogonal to the
reprioritization issue so I've created
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1232 to capture your
comments. I think this might have some cross over with
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1216 so if you coud take
at look at those and add anything more to them it would be appreciated.

Cheers
Lucas